Coutinho Jonathan M, Derkatch Sheldon, Potvin Alphonse R J, Tomlinson George, Kiehl Tim-Rasmus, Silver Frank L, Mandell Daniel M
From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (J.M.C., S.D., D.M.M.), Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (A.R.J.P., F.L.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.-R.K.), University Health Network and the University of Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (G.T.), University of Toronto; and Department of Medicine (G.T.), University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Neurology. 2016 Aug 16;87(7):665-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002978. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
To determine whether large (≥3 mm thick) but nonstenotic (<50%) carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque predominantly occurs ipsilateral rather than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke.
This was a cross-sectional observational study. Using a stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients with anterior circulation embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Using CT angiography, we measured carotid plaque size (thickness, mm) and carotid artery stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method) for each patient. We dichotomized plaque size at several predefined thresholds and calculated the frequency of plaque size above each threshold ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke.
We included 85 patients with ESUS. Plaque with thickness ≥5 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 11% of patients, and contralateral in 1% (9/85 vs 1/85; p = 0.008). Plaque with thickness ≥4 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 19% of patients, and contralateral in 5% (16/85 vs 4/85; p = 0.002). Plaque with thickness ≥3 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 35% of patients, and contralateral in 15% (30/85 vs 13/85; p = 0.001). There was no difference in percentage stenosis ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke (p = 0.98), and weak correlation between plaque size and stenosis (R(2) = 0.26, p < 0.001).
Large but nonstenotic carotid artery plaque is considerably more common ipsilateral than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke, suggesting that nonstenotic plaque is an underrecognized cause of stroke. We measured plaque size using CT angiography, a method that could be easily implemented in clinical practice.
确定大型(≥3毫米厚)但无狭窄(<50%)的颈动脉粥样硬化斑块是否主要出现在隐源性卒中同侧而非对侧。
这是一项横断面观察性研究。利用卒中登记系统,我们识别出连续的前循环不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)患者。通过CT血管造影,我们测量了每位患者的颈动脉斑块大小(厚度,毫米)和颈动脉狭窄程度(采用北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验方法)。我们在几个预先设定的阈值处将斑块大小进行二分,并计算出卒中同侧与对侧高于每个阈值的斑块大小频率。
我们纳入了85例ESUS患者。厚度≥5毫米的斑块出现在卒中同侧的患者占11%,对侧的占1%(9/85对1/85;p = 0.008)。厚度≥4毫米的斑块出现在卒中同侧的患者占19%,对侧的占5%(16/85对4/85;p = 0.002)。厚度≥3毫米的斑块出现在卒中同侧的患者占35%,对侧的占15%(30/85对13/85;p = 0.001)。卒中同侧与对侧的狭窄百分比无差异(p = 0.98),且斑块大小与狭窄之间存在弱相关性(R(2) = 0.26,p < 0.001)。
大型但无狭窄的颈动脉斑块在隐源性卒中同侧比在对侧更为常见,这表明无狭窄斑块是一种未被充分认识的卒中病因。我们使用CT血管造影测量斑块大小,这是一种可在临床实践中轻松实施的方法。