Lysell L, Rohlin M
Department of Oral Surgery, Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Jun;17(3):161-4. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80022-5.
To study the indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar, questionnaires were sent to 35 Oral Surgery Clinics in Sweden, out of which 29 clinics participated. In each clinic, the questionnaires were to be recorded for 30 patients. The indications for removal were classified into 15 groups. There were also questions about symptoms as well as eruption status for the molar being removed. The results were based on data from 870 individuals with a mean age of 27 years. More than half of the removed third molars (54%) presented no subjective symptoms. Such symptoms were more frequent in association with fully or partially erupted molars than molars completely covered by soft or bone tissue. The indication for removal was classified as prophylactic in 27% and as orthodontic in 14%. Earlier episodes of pericoronitis consisted of 1/4 of the indications and caries or pulpitis of the third molar made up 13%. Pathologic entities like cysts, tumours and root resorption were registered in less than 3% each, and were more frequent among patients 40 years of age or older.
为研究下颌第三磨牙拔除的适应证,向瑞典的35家口腔外科诊所发放了问卷,其中29家诊所参与了调查。在每家诊所,要为30名患者记录问卷内容。拔除适应证分为15组。此外,还询问了症状以及被拔除磨牙的萌出状态。结果基于870名平均年龄为27岁个体的数据。超过一半(54%)被拔除的第三磨牙无主观症状。与完全或部分萌出的磨牙相比,此类症状在被软组织或骨组织完全覆盖的磨牙中更为常见。拔除适应证中27%被归类为预防性,14%为正畸性。既往冠周炎发作占适应证的四分之一,第三磨牙龋病或牙髓炎占13%。囊肿、肿瘤和牙根吸收等病理情况各占不到3%,且在40岁及以上患者中更为常见。