Suppr超能文献

COPD 韩国患者中罗氟司特剂量递增策略下的依从性。

Adherence to roflumilast under dose-escalation strategy in Korean patients with COPD.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea,

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Apr 16;14:871-879. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S191033. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frequent development of adverse events and consequent low adherence are major barriers in the wide use of roflumilast. Asian patients may be more susceptible to adverse events due to low BMI. In this study, we aimed to determine if a dose-escalation strategy is useful to improve the drug adherence rate.

METHODS

This was a randomized, prospective, open-label, single-blind study to compare the adherence rate to roflumilast according to a dose-escalation or conventional dose strategy in patients with COPD in South Korea. Patients were randomized into two groups (1:1), either roflumilast 500 μg once daily for 12 weeks or roflumilast 250 μg once daily for 4 weeks, and then 500 μg for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients prematurely discontinuing roflumilast due to adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were randomly assigned to either a conventional-dose group (n=28) or a dose-escalation group (n=27). Discontinuation rates of roflumilast due to adverse events were 46.4% for the conventional-dose group and 59.3% for the dose-escalation group. The median time to discontinuation was not different between groups (58 days for the conventional-dose group, 56 days for the dose-escalation group, =0.629). In a multivariate analysis, older age was a significant risk factor for drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

High discontinuation rates of roflumilast were observed in both groups regardless of the dose-escalation strategy. The frequent discontinuation suggests that the dose-escalation strategy may not be useful in Asian patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL

This study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number NCT02018432.

摘要

背景

由于不良反应频繁发生,加之依从性较低,罗氟司特的广泛应用受到严重阻碍。亚洲患者由于 BMI 较低,可能更容易发生不良反应。本研究旨在确定剂量递增策略是否有助于提高药物的依从率。

方法

这是一项在韩国进行的随机、前瞻性、开放标签、单盲研究,旨在比较 COPD 患者中罗氟司特剂量递增策略与常规剂量策略的依从率。患者随机分为两组(1:1),一组给予罗氟司特 500 μg 每日 1 次治疗 12 周,另一组给予罗氟司特 250 μg 每日 1 次治疗 4 周,然后剂量递增至 500 μg 每日 1 次治疗 12 周。主要结局指标为因不良反应提前终止罗氟司特治疗的患者比例。

结果

共有 55 例患者被随机分为常规剂量组(n=28)或剂量递增组(n=27)。常规剂量组因不良反应终止罗氟司特治疗的患者比例为 46.4%,剂量递增组为 59.3%。两组患者的中位停药时间无差异(常规剂量组为 58 天,剂量递增组为 56 天,=0.629)。多变量分析显示,年龄较大是药物停药的显著危险因素。

结论

两组患者均观察到罗氟司特的停药率较高,与剂量递增策略无关。频繁停药提示该策略在亚洲患者中可能无效。

临床试验

本研究在 www.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT02018432。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/6580853/967d802a3998/copd-14-871Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验