Paipa Andres Julian, Povedano Monica, Barcelo Antonia, Domínguez Raul, Saez Marc, Turon Joana, Prats Enric, Farrero Eva, Virgili Nuria, Martínez Juan Antonio, Corbella Xavier
Neurology Department, IDIBELL-Hospital de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jun 19;12:465-470. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S205313. eCollection 2019.
Multidisciplinary care has become the preferred model of care for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It is assumed that the sum of interventions associated with this approach has a positive effect on survival. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary care approach on the survival of patients with ALS.
We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in a tertiary referral center in Spain. Participants were patients with definite or probable ALS managed in a multidisciplinary care program. We compared demographic and survival data of patients with definite or probable ALS treated in a referral center without and with implementation of a multidisciplinary care program. We performed time-dependent multivariate survival analysis of the use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and gastrostomy.
We evaluated 398 consecutive patients, of whom 54 were treated by a general neurologist and 344 were treated in the multidisciplinary care clinic. Patients receiving multidisciplinary care were older (62 vs 58 years), tended to have bulbar onset disease (30% vs 17.7%), and were more likely to receive riluzole (88.7% vs 29.6%, <0.01), NIMV (48.8% vs 29.6%, >0.001), and nutrition via gastrostomy (32.3% vs 3.7%, <0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 6-month increase in survival (log-rank, 16.03, <0.001). Application of the Andersen-Gill model showed that the variables associated with reduced mortality were reduced time to NIMV and gastrostomy and the duration of both, thus reflecting compliance.
Multidisciplinary care increased the survival of ALS patients in our study population. Timely use of respiratory support and gastrostomy are fundamental aspects of this benefit.
多学科护理已成为肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者首选的护理模式。人们认为,与这种方法相关的一系列干预措施对生存率有积极影响。本研究的目的是评估多学科护理方法对ALS患者生存率的影响。
我们对西班牙一家三级转诊中心前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析。参与者是在多学科护理项目中接受治疗的确诊或疑似ALS患者。我们比较了在未实施和实施多学科护理项目的转诊中心接受治疗的确诊或疑似ALS患者的人口统计学和生存数据。我们对无创机械通气(NIMV)和胃造口术的使用进行了时间依赖性多变量生存分析。
我们评估了398例连续患者,其中54例由普通神经科医生治疗,344例在多学科护理诊所接受治疗。接受多学科护理的患者年龄较大(62岁对58岁),往往患有延髓起病型疾病(30%对17.7%),更有可能接受利鲁唑治疗(88.7%对29.6%,<0.01)、NIMV(48.8%对29.6%,>0.001)以及通过胃造口术进行营养支持(32.3%对3.7%,<0.01)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示生存期延长了6个月(对数秩检验,16.03,<0.001)。Andersen-Gill模型的应用表明,与死亡率降低相关的变量是NIMV和胃造口术的使用时间缩短以及两者的持续时间,从而反映了依从性。
在我们的研究人群中,多学科护理提高了ALS患者的生存率。及时使用呼吸支持和胃造口术是这一益处的基本方面。