Suppr超能文献

严格容量控制下慢性血液透析患者心血管疾病的比较

Comparison of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients under Strict Volume Control with respect to Cardiovascular Disease.

作者信息

Ersoy Dursun Fadime, Gunal Ali Ihsan, Kirciman Ercan, Karaca Ilgin, Dagli Mustafa Necati

机构信息

Firat University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Elazig, Turkey.

Firat University School of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Elazig, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Nephrol. 2019 Jul 3;2019:6430947. doi: 10.1155/2019/6430947. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of strict volume control and nondipper situation on cardiovascular disease in chronic hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This study is an observational and cross-sectional study including 62 patients with normotensive chronic hemodialysis using no antihypertensive drugs. A series of measurements including ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, left ventricular mass index by echocardiography, common carotid artery intima-media thickness by ultrasound, and body fluids by bioimpedance analysis were conducted for all subjects.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups as dippers and nondippers according to their ambulatory blood pressure monitoring results. Average 48 h systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure and nocturnal systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly different between the dipper and nondipper groups (p<0.05). Before and after dialysis, extracellular fluid/intracellular fluid and extracellular fluid/dry body weight ratios were significantly higher in the nondipper group. Left ventricle mass index and interventricular septum thickness were significantly higher in the nondipper group (p<0.05). Left ventricle ejection fraction was significantly lower and common carotid artery intima-media thickness was higher in the nondipper group with a statistical significance (p<0.05). A two-predictor logistic model was fitted to the data to predict the comparability of dippers and nondippers.

CONCLUSION

According to logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for daytime diastolic blood pressure indicates that nondippers are 0.45 times more likely to have high blood pressure than dippers in daytime. But in night time, nondippers are about 2.55 times more likely to have high blood pressure comparing to dippers. An important finding of this study is that nondipping pattern is associated with cardiac hypertrophy and lower left ventricle ejection fraction in dialysis of patients with no hypertension. The results also suggest that applying strict volume control to achieve a normal blood pressure alone is not sufficient to reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality if the patients do not have a dipper status of nocturnal blood pressure.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定严格的容量控制和非勺型血压情况对慢性血液透析患者心血管疾病的影响。

方法

本研究是一项观察性横断面研究,纳入了62例未使用抗高血压药物的血压正常的慢性血液透析患者。对所有受试者进行了一系列测量,包括动态血压监测、超声心动图测量左心室质量指数、超声测量颈总动脉内膜中层厚度以及生物电阻抗分析测量体液情况。

结果

根据动态血压监测结果,将患者分为勺型和非勺型两组。勺型组和非勺型组之间的平均48小时收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压以及夜间收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压存在显著差异(p<0.05)。透析前后,非勺型组的细胞外液/细胞内液和细胞外液/干体重比值显著更高。非勺型组的左心室质量指数和室间隔厚度显著更高(p<0.05)。非勺型组的左心室射血分数显著更低,颈总动脉内膜中层厚度更高,具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。采用双预测逻辑模型对数据进行拟合,以预测勺型和非勺型的可比性。

结论

根据逻辑回归分析,日间舒张压的优势比表明,非勺型患者日间患高血压的可能性是勺型患者的0.45倍。但在夜间,与勺型患者相比,非勺型患者患高血压的可能性约为2.55倍。本研究的一个重要发现是,在无高血压的透析患者中,非勺型血压模式与心脏肥大和较低的左心室射血分数相关。结果还表明,如果患者夜间血压不是勺型,仅通过严格的容量控制来实现正常血压不足以降低心血管发病和死亡风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82f2/6636557/1076974f1892/IJN2019-6430947.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验