Hussain Aliza, Katz William E, Genuardi Michael V, Bhonsale Aditya, Jain Sandeep K, Kancharla Krishna, Saba Samir, Shalaby Alaa A, Voigt Andrew H, Wang Norman C
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;42(9):1183-1190. doi: 10.1111/pace.13765. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists in select situations. For left atrial (LA) appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter, guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) for at least 3 weeks prior to reassessment. Data comparing NOACs to warfarin in this scenario are scarce.
A retrospective study identified subjects with nonvalvular AF or flutter who were: a) noted to have LA thrombus detected on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), b) previously not receiving long-term OAC; and c) evaluated for resolution of LA thrombus by follow-up TEE between 3 weeks to less than 1 year of the initial TEE.
The study included 45 subjects with mean age 63.2 years, 69% male, 78% white race/ethnicity, 42% paroxysmal, and mean CHA DS -VASc score 3.4 ± 1.7. All LA thrombi were confined to the appendage. OAC received included apixaban (3), dabigatran (13), rivaroxaban (6), and warfarin (23), The median follow-up time to repeat TEE was 67 (interquartile range, 49-96) days. LA appendage thrombus resolution rates were 76% for the entire cohort, 77% for NOACs, and 74% for warfarin. In univariable logistic regression analysis, LA appendage thrombus resolution was similar for NOACs when compared to warfarin (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-4.69; P = .79).
In patients nonvalvular AF or flutter who were OAC naïve at the time of diagnosis with LA appendage thrombus, complete resolution was similar between NOACs and warfarin.
在某些情况下,非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)已成为维生素K拮抗剂的替代药物。对于非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)或心房扑动中的左心房(LA)附壁血栓,指南建议在重新评估前至少口服抗凝(OAC)3周。在这种情况下,比较NOACs与华法林的数据很少。
一项回顾性研究确定了患有非瓣膜性AF或心房扑动的受试者,这些受试者:a)经食管超声心动图(TEE)检测发现有LA血栓;b)以前未接受长期OAC;c)在初次TEE后3周内至不到1年的时间通过随访TEE评估LA血栓的溶解情况。
该研究纳入了45名受试者,平均年龄63.2岁,69%为男性,78%为白人种族/民族,42%为阵发性,平均CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分为3.4±1.7。所有LA血栓均局限于附件。接受的OAC包括阿哌沙班(3例)、达比加群(13例)、利伐沙班(6例)和华法林(23例)。重复TEE的中位随访时间为67天(四分位间距,49-96天)。整个队列的LA附件血栓溶解率为76%,NOACs为77%,华法林为74%。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,与华法林相比,NOACs的LA附件血栓溶解情况相似(比值比,1.20;95%置信区间,0.31-4.69;P = 0.79)。
在诊断为LA附件血栓时未接受过OAC治疗的非瓣膜性AF或心房扑动患者中,NOACs与华法林的完全溶解情况相似。