Suppr超能文献

非维生素K口服抗凝药与华法林用于非瓣膜性心房颤动或心房扑动时左心耳血栓溶解的比较

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left atrial appendage thrombus resolution in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or flutter.

作者信息

Hussain Aliza, Katz William E, Genuardi Michael V, Bhonsale Aditya, Jain Sandeep K, Kancharla Krishna, Saba Samir, Shalaby Alaa A, Voigt Andrew H, Wang Norman C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;42(9):1183-1190. doi: 10.1111/pace.13765. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists in select situations. For left atrial (LA) appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter, guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) for at least 3 weeks prior to reassessment. Data comparing NOACs to warfarin in this scenario are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective study identified subjects with nonvalvular AF or flutter who were: a) noted to have LA thrombus detected on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), b) previously not receiving long-term OAC; and c) evaluated for resolution of LA thrombus by follow-up TEE between 3 weeks to less than 1 year of the initial TEE.

RESULTS

The study included 45 subjects with mean age 63.2 years, 69% male, 78% white race/ethnicity, 42% paroxysmal, and mean CHA DS -VASc score 3.4 ± 1.7. All LA thrombi were confined to the appendage. OAC received included apixaban (3), dabigatran (13), rivaroxaban (6), and warfarin (23), The median follow-up time to repeat TEE was 67 (interquartile range, 49-96) days. LA appendage thrombus resolution rates were 76% for the entire cohort, 77% for NOACs, and 74% for warfarin. In univariable logistic regression analysis, LA appendage thrombus resolution was similar for NOACs when compared to warfarin (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-4.69; P = .79).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients nonvalvular AF or flutter who were OAC naïve at the time of diagnosis with LA appendage thrombus, complete resolution was similar between NOACs and warfarin.

摘要

背景

在某些情况下,非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)已成为维生素K拮抗剂的替代药物。对于非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)或心房扑动中的左心房(LA)附壁血栓,指南建议在重新评估前至少口服抗凝(OAC)3周。在这种情况下,比较NOACs与华法林的数据很少。

方法

一项回顾性研究确定了患有非瓣膜性AF或心房扑动的受试者,这些受试者:a)经食管超声心动图(TEE)检测发现有LA血栓;b)以前未接受长期OAC;c)在初次TEE后3周内至不到1年的时间通过随访TEE评估LA血栓的溶解情况。

结果

该研究纳入了45名受试者,平均年龄63.2岁,69%为男性,78%为白人种族/民族,42%为阵发性,平均CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分为3.4±1.7。所有LA血栓均局限于附件。接受的OAC包括阿哌沙班(3例)、达比加群(13例)、利伐沙班(6例)和华法林(23例)。重复TEE的中位随访时间为67天(四分位间距,49-96天)。整个队列的LA附件血栓溶解率为76%,NOACs为77%,华法林为74%。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,与华法林相比,NOACs的LA附件血栓溶解情况相似(比值比,1.20;95%置信区间,0.31-4.69;P = 0.79)。

结论

在诊断为LA附件血栓时未接受过OAC治疗的非瓣膜性AF或心房扑动患者中,NOACs与华法林的完全溶解情况相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验