Yorgun Hikmet, Canpolat Uğur, Ates Ahmet Hakan, Oksul Metin, Sener Yusuf Ziya, Akkaya Fatih, Aytemir Kudret
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, The Netherlands.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;42(9):1175-1182. doi: 10.1111/pace.13764. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Immediate hemostasis following removal of sheaths is essential to prevent access site complications after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Despite various precautions to achieve complete hemostasis in a safe and effective manner, no standard approach is present yet.
We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard vs modified figure-of-eight (sFoE vs mFoE) suture for immediate venous hemostasis after cryoballoon (CB) AF ablation.
A total of 150 patients who underwent CB catheter ablation were sequentially allocated to either sFoE (n = 75) or mFoE (n = 75) suture to achieve immediate venous hemostasis at right femoral access site after 15 Fr sheath removal. A "three-way stopcock" was used in the mFoE group rather than tying the knot as in a sFoE group. Demographics, clinical and procedural data, and access site complications were recorded.
Immediate haemostasis was achieved in all patients (n = 75) with mFoE suture as compared to 90.7% (n = 68) of sFoE suture group (P < .001). Light manual pressure of ≤1 min was required in five patients (6.7%) due to looseness and conventional manual compression because of the snapped silk suture during knotting was required in two patients (2.6%) in the sFoE group. Time to hemostasis was shorter in the mFoE group (P < .001), but time to ambulation and time to discharge were similar in both groups (P > .05). Although no minor or major access site complication has occurred in the mFoE group, in-hospital rebleeding (n = 2, 2.7%) and early local access site infection (n = 2, 2.7%) were observed in the sFoE group.
The mFoE suture using three-way stopcock is an available, effective, maybe safe, and time- and cost-saving alternative technique to achieve immediate hemostasis after removal of 15 Fr right femoral venous sheath in patients undergoing cryoablation.
心房颤动(AF)消融术后,鞘管拔除后的即刻止血对于预防穿刺部位并发症至关重要。尽管采取了各种预防措施以安全有效地实现完全止血,但目前尚无标准方法。
我们旨在比较标准8字缝合法(sFoE)与改良8字缝合法(mFoE)在冷冻球囊(CB)AF消融术后即刻静脉止血的疗效和安全性。
总共150例行CB导管消融术的患者在拔除15F鞘管后,依次被分配接受sFoE(n = 75)或mFoE(n = 75)缝合法以实现右股静脉穿刺部位的即刻止血。mFoE组使用“三通旋塞”,而不是像sFoE组那样打结。记录人口统计学、临床和手术数据以及穿刺部位并发症。
mFoE缝合法组的所有患者(n = 75)均实现了即刻止血,而sFoE缝合法组为90.7%(n = 68)(P <.001)。sFoE组有2例患者(2.6%)因打结时丝线断裂需要常规手动压迫止血,mFoE组有5例患者(6.7%)因缝线松动需要≤1分钟的轻度手动压迫。mFoE组的止血时间更短(P <.001),但两组的下床活动时间和出院时间相似(P >.05)。尽管mFoE组未发生轻微或严重的穿刺部位并发症,但sFoE组观察到院内再出血(n = 2,2.7%)和早期局部穿刺部位感染(n = 2,2.7%)。
对于接受冷冻消融的患者,使用三通旋塞的mFoE缝合法是一种可行、有效、可能安全且节省时间和成本的替代技术,可在拔除15F右股静脉鞘管后实现即刻止血。