Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):222-232. doi: 10.1111/his.13960. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
Patients with aggressive CD8+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) progress rapidly and respond poorly to therapy. Confounding treatment planning, there is clinicopathological overlap between aggressive CD8+ CTCLs and other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). Hence, improved diagnostic methods and therapeutic options are needed. The aim of this study was to examine C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) expression as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs.
Forty-nine cases (41 patients) with CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs were examined, including CD8+ mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 14), aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma (AETCL) (n = 8), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) (n = 7), CD30+ LPDs (n = 6), primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (GDTCL) (n = 6), and others (n = 8). Immunohistochemical tissue staining was performed with a CCR4 monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. CCR4 immunostaining was graded as percentage infiltrate, i.e. high (>25%) and low (≤25%), and the results were correlated with clinicopathological diagnoses. CCR4 expression was seen in 69% of the studied cases. Any CCR4 positivity was seen in all CD8+ MF cases, in 83% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 75% of AETCL cases, in 33% of GDTCL cases, and in none of the SPTCL cases. High CCR4 expression was seen in 79% of CD8+ MF cases versus 33% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 17% of GDTCL cases, and in 12.5% of AETCL cases. Patients with more advanced MF stage had higher CCR4 expression.
CCR4 immunohistochemistry may be an adjunct in distinguishing advanced CD8+ MF from other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs. Although CCR4 expression may justify therapeutic targeting of this receptor in CD8+ MF, the role of such therapies in other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs is not yet clear.
侵袭性 CD8+皮肤 T 细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)患者进展迅速,对治疗反应不佳。由于侵袭性 CD8+ CTCL 与其他淋巴增殖性疾病(LPD)之间存在临床病理重叠,因此治疗计划受到干扰。因此,需要改进诊断方法和治疗选择。本研究旨在探讨 C-C 趋化因子受体 4(CCR4)在 CD8+ CTCL/LPD 中的表达作为诊断和治疗的生物标志物。
共检查了 49 例(41 例患者)CD8+ CTCL/LPD 患者,包括 CD8+蕈样真菌病(MF)(n=14)、侵袭性表皮亲 T 细胞淋巴瘤(AETCL)(n=8)、皮下脂膜炎样 T 细胞淋巴瘤(SPTCL)(n=7)、CD30+LPD(n=6)、原发性皮肤γδ T 细胞淋巴瘤(GDTCL)(n=6)和其他(n=8)。用 CCR4 单克隆抗体对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织切片进行免疫组织化学染色。CCR4 免疫染色按浸润百分比分级,即高(>25%)和低(≤25%),并将结果与临床病理诊断相关联。在研究的病例中,有 69%的病例表达 CCR4。所有 CD8+MF 病例均有任何 CCR4 阳性,83%的 CD30+LPD 病例,75%的 AETCL 病例,33%的 GDTCL 病例,和 0 例 SPTCL 病例有 CCR4 阳性。79%的 CD8+MF 病例和 33%的 CD30+LPD 病例高 CCR4 表达,17%的 GDTCL 病例和 12.5%的 AETCL 病例高 CCR4 表达。进展期 MF 患者的 CCR4 表达更高。
CCR4 免疫组化可能有助于区分晚期 CD8+MF 与其他 CD8+CTCL/LPD。尽管 CCR4 表达可能证明在 CD8+MF 中靶向该受体具有治疗意义,但在其他 CD8+CTCL/LPD 中此类治疗的作用尚不清楚。