• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性膀胱切除术后尿流改道患者上尿路结石的危险因素

Risk factors of calculi in upper urinary tract after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.

作者信息

Zhang B, Xie H, Liu C

机构信息

Departamento de Urología, Instituto Tianjin de Urología, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Departamento de Urología, Instituto Tianjin de Urología, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;43(10):568-572. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2019.04.002
PMID:31358300
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The study was conducted to identify the risk factors of upper tract stone formation in patients with diversions after radical cystectomy (RC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with diversion after RC were collected in our center from January 2005 to December 2013. Three different common diversions were included: Orthotopic neobladder (ON: 168 patients), Ileal Conduit (IC: 93 patients) or Ureterocutaneostomy (UC: 104 patients). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the independent predictors of stone formation in the upper tract.

RESULTS

A total of 365 consecutive patients (316 males, 49 females) were included. At a median follow-up of 48 months (range 12-65 months), 36 patients (9.9%) developed upper tract stone. Among them, 26 (72.2%), 5 (13.9%) and 5 (13.9%) patients underwent ON, IC and UC, respectively. 25 patients had renal stone and 11 ureter stone. Minimally invasive operations (endoscopic laser lithotripsy via the anterograde or retrograde approach in 24 cases, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 9 cases and shock wave lithotripsy in 3 cases) were carried out successfully in all stone cases. On univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, urinary tract infection (UTI), anastomotic stenosis and types of diversions (P<.05) were positively associated with upper tract stone formation.

CONCLUSIONS

The variable predictors of upper tract stone may contain diabetes mellitus, hypertension, UTI, anastomotic stenosis and types of diversion.

摘要

引言与目的

本研究旨在确定根治性膀胱切除术后(RC)行尿流改道患者上尿路结石形成的危险因素。

材料与方法

收集2005年1月至2013年12月在本中心接受RC术后尿流改道的所有患者。纳入三种不同的常见尿流改道方式:原位新膀胱(ON:168例患者)、回肠膀胱术(IC:93例患者)或输尿管皮肤造口术(UC:104例患者)。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定上尿路结石形成的独立预测因素。

结果

共纳入365例连续患者(316例男性,49例女性)。中位随访48个月(范围12 - 65个月),36例患者(9.9%)发生上尿路结石。其中,分别有26例(72.2%)、5例(13.9%)和5例(13.9%)患者接受了ON、IC和UC手术。25例患者有肾结石,11例有输尿管结石。所有结石病例均成功进行了微创手术(24例经顺行或逆行途径的内镜激光碎石术、9例经皮肾镜取石术和3例冲击波碎石术)。在单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析中,糖尿病、高血压、尿路感染(UTI)、吻合口狭窄和尿流改道方式(P<0.05)与上尿路结石形成呈正相关。

结论

上尿路结石的可变预测因素可能包括糖尿病、高血压、UTI、吻合口狭窄和尿流改道方式。

相似文献

1
Risk factors of calculi in upper urinary tract after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.根治性膀胱切除术后尿流改道患者上尿路结石的危险因素
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;43(10):568-572. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion.膀胱切除及尿流改道患者上尿路结石的体外冲击波碎石术
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):510-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.008.
3
Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion.尿流改道后大型上尿路结石的经皮治疗
Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.065. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
4
Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies.回肠代膀胱术后的尿石症:微创治疗的比较。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.003. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
5
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.逆行输尿管肾盂镜治疗2厘米及以上上尿路结石和小型鹿角形结石。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):346-51.
6
The impact of running versus interrupted anastomosis on ureterointestinal stricture rate after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后,跑步与间断吻合对输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄发生率的影响。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.091. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
7
[Multiple endoscopy for the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi following ileal conduit: a case report and literature review].[回肠代膀胱术后上尿路结石的多次内镜治疗:1例报告及文献复习]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Aug 18;49(4):733-735.
8
Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术后原位乙状结肠新膀胱术:技术要点、并发症和功能结果。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):928-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.072. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Comparison of postoperative acute kidney injury between ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversions after radical cystectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.根治性膀胱切除术后回肠膀胱术与新膀胱尿流改道术术后急性肾损伤的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004838.
10
[ESWL for urolithiasis in a patient with transileal ureterocutaneostomy].[经髂输尿管皮肤造口术患者的尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术]
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1997 Feb;69(1):73-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper tract access in patients with urinary diversions.尿流改道患者的上尿路通路
Front Urol. 2024 Jun 25;4:1392139. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1392139. eCollection 2024.
2
Urinary calculi composition and its correlation with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH and underlying diseases: a retrospective study.尿结石成分及其与性别、年龄、结石部位、尿液pH值和基础疾病的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7688-7697. doi: 10.62347/CVWT8813. eCollection 2024.
3
Surgical outcomes and postoperative hemorrhage risk of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for deer horn shaped stones analyzed by Lasso regression.
通过套索回归分析鹿角形结石经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的手术结果及术后出血风险
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Sep 15;15(9):5949-5958. eCollection 2023.
4
Risk factors for urinary infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy: Implication for nursing.逆行性上尿路碎石术后尿路感染的危险因素:对护理的启示。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 6;100(31):e26172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026172.