Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Sep;161(9):1747-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04016-x. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Giant intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation (GPCirA) are rare entities compressing the brainstem and adjacent structures. Previous evidence has shown that the amount of brainstem shift away from the cranial base is not associated with neurological deficits. This raises the question whether other factors may be associated with neurological deficits.
All data were extracted from the Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry, an international multicenter prospective study on giant intracranial aneurysms. We grouped GPCirA according to the mass effect on the brainstem (lateral versus medial). Brainstem compression was evaluated with two indices: (a) brainstem compression ratio (BCR) or diameter of the compressed brainstem to the assumed normal diameter of the brainstem and (b) aneurysm to brainstem ratio (ABR) or diameter of the aneurysm to the diameter of the compressed brainstem. We examined associations between neurological deficits and GPCirA characteristics using binary regression analysis.
Twenty-eight GPCirA were included. Twenty GPCirA showed medial (71.4%) and 8 lateral compression of the brainstem (28.6%). Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups for patient age, aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), motor deficit (MD), or cranial nerve deficits (CND). Mean BCR was 53.0 in the medial and 54.0 in the lateral group (p = 0.92). The mean ABR was 2.9 in the medial and 2.3 in the lateral group (p = 0.96). In the entire cohort, neither BCR nor ABR nor GPCirA volumes were associated with the occurrence of CND or MD. In contrast, disability (mRS) was significantly associated with ABR (OR 1.94 (95% CI 1.01-3.70; p = 0.045) and GPCirA volumes (OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.44); p = 0.035), but not with BCR.
In this cohort of patients with GPCirA, neither the degree of lateral projection nor the amount of brainstem compression predicted neurological deficits. Disability was associated only with aneurysm volume. When designing treatment strategies for GPCirA, aneurysm laterality or the amount of brainstem compression should be viewed as less relevant while the high risk of rupture of such giant lesions should be emphasized.
The registry is listed at clinicaltrials.gov under the registration no. NCT02066493.
后循环(PCirA)巨大颅内动脉瘤是一种罕见的实体,压迫脑干和邻近结构。先前的证据表明,脑干从颅底移位的程度与神经功能缺损无关。这就提出了一个问题,即是否有其他因素与神经功能缺损有关。
所有数据均从国际多中心前瞻性大型颅内动脉瘤注册研究中提取。我们根据对脑干的质量效应将 GPCirA 分为外侧组和内侧组。用两个指数评估脑干受压:(a)脑干受压比(BCR)或受压脑干直径与假定正常脑干直径之比;(b)动脉瘤与脑干比(ABR)或动脉瘤直径与受压脑干直径之比。我们使用二元回归分析检查了 GPCirA 特征与神经功能缺损之间的关系。
共纳入 28 例 GPCirA。20 例 GPCirA 显示为内侧(71.4%)和 8 例外侧(28.6%)压迫脑干。两组患者的年龄、动脉瘤直径、动脉瘤体积、改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)、运动障碍(MD)或颅神经缺损(CND)等基线特征无差异。内侧组 BCR 平均值为 53.0,外侧组为 54.0(p=0.92)。内侧组 ABR 平均值为 2.9,外侧组为 2.3(p=0.96)。在整个队列中,BCR 或 ABR 或 GPCirA 体积均与 CND 或 MD 的发生无关。相反,残疾(mRS)与 ABR 显著相关(OR 1.94(95%CI 1.01-3.70;p=0.045)和 GPCirA 体积(OR 1.21(95%CI 1.01-1.44);p=0.035),但与 BCR 无关。
在本队列中,GPCirA 患者的外侧投影程度或脑干受压程度均不能预测神经功能缺损。残疾仅与动脉瘤体积有关。在为 GPCirA 制定治疗策略时,应认为动脉瘤的侧位和脑干受压程度不太重要,而应强调此类巨大病变破裂的高风险。
该注册研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 上的登记号为 NCT02066493。