Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jul 9;2019:9584748. doi: 10.1155/2019/9584748. eCollection 2019.
The effect of ramosetron on the analgesic action of tramadol is not well known when ramosetron is added to intravenous-tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and infused continuously. The aim of this randomized noninferiority study was to evaluate the effects of ramosetron on the analgesic action of tramadol when it is administered simultaneously in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecology who are receiving tramadol via IV PCA.
This study used a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical trial design and compared the analgesic effect of tramadol plus ramosetron with that of tramadol only. A total of 110 postoperative patients, who were using IV PCA tramadol, were randomly assigned either to a group receiving ramosetron (group R, n=49) or to a group that received the same volume of normal saline continuously (group N, n=51). Observation time points for cumulative tramadol consumption were the first hour, and every 4 h up to 12 h and then 24 h after surgery. Pain intensity at rest and during movement, coughing, and nausea scores, the analgesic and antiemetic doses used, side effects, and patient satisfaction were evaluated 1 and 24 h after surgery.
Groups R and N received, respectively, 88 ± 55 vs. 79 ± 42 mg tramadol (P=0.511) after 1 h, 211 ± 122 vs. 198 ± 109 mg cumulative tramadol (P=0.610) after 4 h, 244 ± 150 vs. 231 ± 134 mg cumulative tramadol (P= 0.793) after 8 h, 250 ± 156 vs. 247 ± 153 mg cumulative tramadol (P=0.972) after 12 h, and 294 ± 190 vs. 284 ± 178 mg cumulative tramadol (P=0.791) after 24 h, postsurgery. Tramadol plus ramosetron was shown to be not significantly inferior to tramadol alone in alleviating the postoperative pain.
The analgesic effect of tramadol combined with ramosetron was found to be noninferior to tramadol alone for postoperative PCA after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
当雷莫司琼与持续输注的静脉注射曲马多患者自控镇痛(PCA)联合使用时,其对曲马多镇痛作用的影响尚不清楚。本随机非劣效性研究旨在评估雷莫司琼对接受静脉 PCA 曲马多的腹腔镜妇科手术女性患者的曲马多镇痛作用的影响。
本研究采用前瞻性、随机、对照、非劣效性临床试验设计,比较了曲马多加雷莫司琼与单纯曲马多的镇痛效果。共 110 例术后使用静脉 PCA 曲马多的患者,随机分为雷莫司琼组(R 组,n=49)或生理盐水连续输注组(N 组,n=51)。观察累积曲马多消耗的时间点为术后第 1 小时,以及术后 4、8、12 和 24 小时。评估术后 1 和 24 小时的静息和运动时疼痛强度、咳嗽时疼痛强度、恶心评分、使用的镇痛和止吐剂量、不良反应和患者满意度。
R 组和 N 组分别在第 1 小时后接受 88±55 毫克和 79±42 毫克曲马多(P=0.511),在第 4 小时后接受 211±122 毫克和 198±109 毫克累积曲马多(P=0.610),在第 8 小时后接受 244±150 毫克和 231±134 毫克累积曲马多(P=0.793),在第 12 小时后接受 250±156 毫克和 247±153 毫克累积曲马多(P=0.972),在第 24 小时后接受 294±190 毫克和 284±178 毫克累积曲马多(P=0.791)。曲马多联合雷莫司琼与单独使用曲马多相比,在缓解术后疼痛方面无显著差异。
曲马多联合雷莫司琼用于腹腔镜妇科手术后 PCA 的镇痛效果不劣于单独使用曲马多。