Scott Anthony T, Pecen Paula E, Palestine Alan G
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, 1675 Aurora Court, Mailstop F731, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 17;11:2515841419863638. doi: 10.1177/2515841419863638. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Cost-related nonadherence to medication can impact ophthalmic treatment outcomes. We aimed to determine whether medication prices vary between US cities and between different types of pharmacies within one city.
We conducted a phone survey of eight nationwide and five independent pharmacies in five cities across the United States: Boston, Massachusetts; Charlotte, North Carolina; Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; and Seattle, Washington. A researcher called each pharmacy asking for price without insurance for four common anti-inflammatory ophthalmic medications: prednisolone acetate, prednisolone sodium phosphate, difluprednate (Durezol™), and loteprednol etabonate (Lotemax™).
Prednisolone sodium phosphate price could only be obtained by a small subset of pharmacies (45.2%) and was excluded from additional analysis; however, preliminary data demonstrated lower cost of prednisolone sodium phosphate over prednisolone acetate. Three-way analysis of variance revealed no interaction between pharmacy type (chain independent), city, and drug ( = 0.40, = 0.92). A significant interaction was identified between pharmacy type and drug ( = 5.0, = 0.008), but not city and pharmacy type ( = 0.66, = 0.62) or city and drug ( = 0.27, = 0.97). Average drug prices were lower at independent pharmacies compared with chain pharmacies for difluprednate (US$211.36 US$216.85, = 1.09, = 0.297) and significantly lower for loteprednol etabonate (US$255.49 US$274.86, = 14.7, < 0.001). Prednisolone acetate was cheaper at chain pharmacies, but not statistically significantly cheaper (US$48.82 US$51.61, = 0.34, = 0.559).
Medication prices do not differ significantly between US cities. High variation of drug prices within the same city demonstrates how comparison shopping can provide cost savings for patients and may reduce cost-related nonadherence.
与费用相关的用药依从性不佳会影响眼科治疗效果。我们旨在确定美国不同城市之间以及同一城市不同类型药店之间的药品价格是否存在差异。
我们对美国五个城市的八家全国性药店和五家独立药店进行了电话调查,这五个城市分别是马萨诸塞州的波士顿、北卡罗来纳州的夏洛特、科罗拉多州的丹佛、密歇根州的底特律以及华盛顿州的西雅图。一名研究人员致电每家药店,询问四种常见抗炎眼科药物在无保险情况下的价格,这四种药物分别是醋酸泼尼松龙、泼尼松龙磷酸钠、地氟泼尼酯(Durezol™)和洛替泼诺尔依碳酸酯(Lotemax™)。
只有一小部分药店(45.2%)能提供泼尼松龙磷酸钠的价格,因此该药物被排除在进一步分析之外;不过,初步数据显示泼尼松龙磷酸钠的成本低于醋酸泼尼松龙。三因素方差分析显示药店类型(连锁药店与独立药店)、城市和药物之间不存在交互作用(F = 0.40,P = 0.92)。在药店类型和药物之间发现了显著的交互作用(F = 5.0,P = 0.008),但城市和药店类型之间(F = 0.66,P = 0.62)以及城市和药物之间(F = 0.27,P = 0.97)不存在交互作用。地氟泼尼酯方面,独立药店的平均药品价格低于连锁药店(211.36美元对216.85美元,F = 1.09,P = 0.297),洛替泼诺尔依碳酸酯的平均药品价格则显著低于连锁药店(255.49美元对274.86美元,F = 14.7,P < 0.001)。醋酸泼尼松龙在连锁药店更便宜,但差异无统计学意义(48.82美元对51.61美元,F = 0.34,P = 0.559)。
美国不同城市之间的药品价格没有显著差异。同一城市内药品价格的高度差异表明,比较购物可为患者节省费用,并可能减少与费用相关的用药依从性不佳情况。