CIP, Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal.
Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2094-2105. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz148.
Research on social disparities in pain care has been mainly focused on the role of race/racism and sex/sexism. Classism in pain assessment and management practices has been much less investigated. We aimed to test the effect of patient socioeconomic status (SES; a proxy of social class) on nurses' pain assessment and management practices and whether patient SES modulated the effects of patient distress and evidence of pathology on such practices.
Two experimental studies with a two (patient SES: low/high) by two (patient distress or evidence of pathology: absent/present) between-subject design.
Female nurses participated in two experimental studies (N = 150/N = 158).
Nurses were presented with a vignette/picture depicting the clinical case of a female with chronic low back pain, followed by a video of the patient performing a pain-inducing movement. Afterwards, nurses reported their pain assessment and management practices.
The low-SES patient's pain was assessed as less intense, more attributed to psychological factors, and considered less credible (in the presence of distress cues) than the higher-SES patient's pain. Higher SES buffered the detrimental impact of the presence of distress cues on pain assessment. No effects were found on management practices.
Our findings point to the potential buffering role of SES against the detrimental effect of certain clinical cues on pain assessments. This study contributes to highlighting the need for further investigation of the role of SES/social class on pain care and its underlying meanings and processes.
关于疼痛护理中的社会差异的研究主要集中在种族/种族主义和性别/性别歧视的作用上。在疼痛评估和管理实践中,阶级主义的作用研究得要少得多。我们旨在检验患者社会经济地位(SES;社会阶层的代表)对护士疼痛评估和管理实践的影响,以及患者 SES 是否调节了患者痛苦和病理证据对这些实践的影响。
两项具有两个(患者 SES:低/高)乘两个(患者痛苦或病理证据:无/有)被试间设计的实验研究。
女性护士参加了两项实验研究(N=150/N=158)。
护士阅读了一个描述慢性下背痛女性患者的临床案例的情景描述/图片,然后观看了患者进行疼痛诱发运动的视频。之后,护士报告了他们的疼痛评估和管理实践。
与高 SES 患者的疼痛相比,低 SES 患者的疼痛被评估为强度较低、更多归因于心理因素且被认为可信度较低(在存在痛苦线索的情况下)。SES 较高缓冲了痛苦线索存在对疼痛评估的不利影响。对管理实践没有影响。
我们的研究结果表明,SES 可能对某些临床线索对疼痛评估的不利影响具有缓冲作用。本研究有助于强调需要进一步研究 SES/社会阶层对疼痛护理及其潜在意义和过程的作用。