Occhiogrosso Jessica, Hemminger Lauryn, Burke Joy, Ibegbu Chinazom, Serventi Jennifer, Mohile Nimish
Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
J Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;23(2):264-267. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0242. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
Glioma patients make frequent decisions regarding treatment and end-of-life care despite cognitive limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of incorporating the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to assess decision-making ability in glioma patients. High-grade glioma patients were consented to an IRB-approved prospective study at one of three treatment decision time points. Patients completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and providers informally assessed patient decision-making ability based on neurologic examination. The MacCAT-T, designed to assess patient decision-making domains, was administered by a research assistant. MoCA, provider assessment, and MacCAT-T results were compared to determine whether the MacCAT-T provided additional information. To assess feasibility, we measured administration time and obtained qualitative patient feedback. Eleven patients (median age = 68 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] = 80-90) were enrolled. MacCAT-T administration averaged 18.5 minutes. Ninety percent of patients reported "increased knowledge of their treatment options" after taking the MacCAT-T. Clinicians deemed 10 patients to possess sufficient decision-making ability, yet, 6 of them demonstrated impairments in reasoning on the MacCAT-T. Seven patients yielded discordant MOCA and MacCAT-T data, five patients with MOCA score ≥26 showed qualitative MacCAT-T impairments in and five patients who scored <21 were within nonimpaired ranges for three of four decision-making domains. MacCAT-T administration was feasible and informative to patients but findings were discordant from MOCA and informal provider assessments. The MacCAT-T may help in identifying mild impairments related to patients' initial treatment decisions and should be studied further to determine its role in clinical practice.
尽管存在认知限制,胶质瘤患者仍需频繁做出关于治疗和临终关怀的决定。我们评估了采用麦克阿瑟治疗能力评估工具(MacCAT-T)来评估胶质瘤患者决策能力的可行性。高级别胶质瘤患者在三个治疗决策时间点之一同意参加一项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究。患者完成蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA),医护人员根据神经学检查对患者的决策能力进行非正式评估。旨在评估患者决策领域的MacCAT-T由一名研究助理进行管理。对MoCA、医护人员评估和MacCAT-T的结果进行比较,以确定MacCAT-T是否能提供额外信息。为评估可行性,我们测量了管理时间并获得了患者的定性反馈。共招募了11名患者(中位年龄 = 68岁,中位卡诺夫斯基功能状态 [KPS] = 80 - 90)。MacCAT-T的管理平均用时18.5分钟。90%的患者表示在进行MacCAT-T评估后“对治疗选择的了解有所增加”。临床医生认为10名患者具备足够的决策能力,然而,其中6名患者在MacCAT-T的推理方面表现出缺陷。7名患者的MoCA和MacCAT-T数据不一致,5名MoCA评分≥26的患者在MacCAT-T中存在定性缺陷,5名评分<21的患者在四个决策领域中的三个领域处于无缺陷范围内。MacCAT-T的管理对患者来说是可行且提供了信息的,但结果与MoCA和医护人员的非正式评估不一致。MacCAT-T可能有助于识别与患者初始治疗决策相关的轻度缺陷,应进一步研究以确定其在临床实践中的作用。