Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Gastroenterology. 2019 Nov;157(5):1213-1221.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.037. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether closure of mucosal defects with clips after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) prevents delayed bleeding, although it seems to have no protective effects when risk is low. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of complete clip closure of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal lesions after EMR in patients with an estimated average or high risk of delayed bleeding.
We performed a single-blind trial at 11 hospitals in Spain from May 2016 through June 2018, including 235 consecutive patients who underwent EMR for large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions with an average or high risk of delayed bleeding (based on Spanish Endoscopy Society Endoscopic Resection Group score). Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received closure of the scar with 11-mm through-the-scope clips (treated, n = 119) or no clip (control, n = 116). The primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group with delayed bleeding, defined as evident hematochezia that required medical intervention within 15 days after colonoscopy.
In the clip group, complete closure was achieved in 68 (57%) cases, with partial closure in 33 (28%) cases and failure to close in 18 (15%) cases. Delayed bleeding occurred in 14 (12.1%) patients in the control group and in 6 (5%) patients in the clip group (absolute risk difference, reduction of 7% in the clip group; 95% confidence interval, -14.7% to 0.3%). After completion of the clip closure, there was only 1 (1.5%) case of delayed bleeding (absolute risk difference, reduction of 10.6%; 95% confidence interval, -4.3% to 17.9%).
In a randomized trial of patients with large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions undergoing EMR, we found that clip closure of mucosal defects in patients with a risk of bleeding can be a challenge, but also reduces delayed bleeding. Prevention of delayed bleeding required complete clip closure. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02765022.
虽然内镜下结肠黏膜切除术(EMR)后使用夹闭器闭合黏膜缺损似乎对低风险患者没有保护作用,但对于中高危风险患者,是否能预防迟发性出血还不清楚。我们进行了一项随机试验,以评估 EMR 后对中高危迟发性出血风险的非息肉状大肠病变(≥2cm)使用完全夹闭黏膜缺损的效果。
我们于 2016 年 5 月至 2018 年 6 月在西班牙的 11 家医院进行了一项单盲试验,纳入 235 例因中高危迟发性出血风险而接受 EMR 治疗的非息肉状大肠病变患者(基于西班牙内镜学会内镜切除组评分)。参与者被随机分配至接受 11mm 经内镜夹闭(治疗组,n=119)或不夹闭(对照组,n=116)的两组。主要结局为两组中迟发性出血患者的比例,定义为结肠镜检查后 15 天内明显血便需要药物干预的患者。
夹闭组中,68 例(57%)完全闭合,33 例(28%)部分闭合,18 例(15%)闭合失败。对照组中有 14 例(12.1%)患者出现迟发性出血,夹闭组中有 6 例(5%)患者出现迟发性出血(绝对风险差异,夹闭组减少 7%;95%置信区间,-14.7%至 0.3%)。完成夹闭后,仅 1 例(1.5%)出现迟发性出血(绝对风险差异,减少 10.6%;95%置信区间,-4.3%至 17.9%)。
在一项对接受 EMR 的非息肉状大肠病变患者进行的随机试验中,我们发现,对有出血风险的患者进行黏膜缺损夹闭可能具有挑战性,但也可降低迟发性出血的风险。预防迟发性出血需要完全夹闭。临床试验注册号:NCT02765022。