Suppr超能文献

鉴定用兔疟原虫 AMA1 进行临床试验的佐剂。

Identification of adjuvants for clinical trials performed with Plasmodium falciparum AMA1 in rabbits.

机构信息

Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Department of Parasitology, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Immunol. 2019 Jul 30;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12865-019-0307-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, seven adjuvants were compared for use with Plasmodium falciparum DiCo-Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (Pf-DiCo-AMA1), with the aim to identify an ideal adjuvant which yields high antibody titres and potentially broadens the responses in clinical trials. The following adjuvant formulations were evaluated: SE, SE-GLA, Liposomes, Liposomes-GLA, CoVaccine HT™, ImSaVac-P and ImSaVac-P o/w. The study was performed in rabbits, which were immunized with FVO-AMA1 in combination with one of the seven adjuvants. Antibody levels (humoral responses) and functional activity of the antibodies induced against malaria vaccine candidate AMA1 were evaluated. Thus, in this study the ideal adjuvant is expected to induce high functional antibody levels, a long-lived response, and a broad cross-strain activity.

RESULTS

AMA1 formulated in all adjuvants was immunogenic. However, the magnitude of the immune responses differed between the seven adjuvants. The highest IgG levels were observed for the CoVaccine HT™ group, this was statistically significant for all four AMA1 variants versus all other adjuvant groups. No differences were observed in the breadth of the humoral response, i.e., increased recognition of AMA1 variants. Also, Growth Inhibition Activity (GIA) for both Plasmodium falciparum strains (FCR3 - homologous to FVO AMA1 protein and NF54 - heterologous to FVO AMA1 protein) were significantly higher in the CoVaccine HT™ group as compared to the other adjuvant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In brief, all seven vaccine - adjuvant formulations were immunogenic. The magnitude of the immune responses differed between the seven adjuvants. No statistically significant differences were observed in the breadth of the humoral response, nor in longevity of the response. Nevertheless, AMA1 formulated in CoVaccine HT™ appeared as the best adjuvant for use in clinical trials.

摘要

背景

在这项研究中,比较了七种佐剂与恶性疟原虫裂殖体表面蛋白 1(Pf-DiCo-AMA1)的联合使用效果,旨在寻找一种理想的佐剂,以产生高抗体滴度,并在临床试验中潜在地拓宽反应范围。评估了以下佐剂制剂:SE、SE-GLA、脂质体、脂质体-GLA、CoVaccine HT™、ImSaVac-P 和 ImSaVac-P o/w。该研究在兔子中进行,兔子用 FVO-AMA1 免疫,并与其中一种七种佐剂联合使用。评估了针对疟疾候选疫苗 AMA1 诱导的抗体水平(体液反应)和抗体的功能活性。因此,在这项研究中,理想的佐剂预计会诱导高水平的功能性抗体、长效反应和广泛的交叉株活性。

结果

用所有佐剂配制的 AMA1 具有免疫原性。然而,七种佐剂之间的免疫反应强度不同。CoVaccine HT™ 组观察到的 IgG 水平最高,与所有其他佐剂组相比,这在所有四种 AMA1 变体中均具有统计学意义。在体液反应的广度上没有观察到差异,即增加了对 AMA1 变体的识别。此外,CoVaccine HT™ 组对两种恶性疟原虫株(与 FVO AMA1 蛋白同源的 FCR3 和与 FVO AMA1 蛋白异源的 NF54)的生长抑制活性(GIA)均显著高于其他佐剂组。

结论

简而言之,所有七种疫苗-佐剂制剂都具有免疫原性。七种佐剂之间的免疫反应强度不同。在体液反应的广度或反应的持久性方面,没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,CoVaccine HT™ 中配制的 AMA1 似乎是临床试验中使用的最佳佐剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e760/6664700/8a5cd352d972/12865_2019_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验