Assistant Professor and Clinician Scientist, Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Canada.
Professor, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, USA.
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;218(3):143-150. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.184.
Low-intensity psychosocial interventions have been effective in targeting perinatal depression, but relevant mechanisms of change remain unknown.
To examine three theoretically informed mediators of the Thinking Healthy Programme Peer-delivered (THPP), an evidence-based psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression, on symptom severity in two parallel, randomised controlled trials in Goa, India and Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Participants included pregnant women aged ≥18 years with moderate to severe depression, as defined by a Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10, and were randomised to either THPP or enhanced usual care. We examine whether three prespecified variables (patient activation, social support and mother-child attachment) at 3 months post-childbirth mediated the effects of THPP interventions of perinatal depressive symptom severity (PHQ-9) at the primary end-point of 6 months post-childbirth. We first examined individual mediation within each trial (n = 280 in India and n = 570 in Pakistan), followed by a pooled analysis across both trials (N = 850).
In both site-specific and pooled analyses, patient activation and support at 3 months independently mediated the intervention effects on depressive symptom severity at 6 months, accounting for 23.6 and 18.2% of the total effect of THPP, respectively. The intervention had no effect on mother-child attachment scores, thus there was no evidence that this factor mediated the intervention effect.
The effects of the psychosocial intervention on depression outcomes in mothers were mediated by the same two factors in both contexts, suggesting that such interventions seeking to alleviate perinatal depression should target both social support and patient activation levels.
None.
低强度心理社会干预措施已被证明可有效针对围产期抑郁,但相关的变化机制仍不清楚。
在印度果阿和巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第的两项平行随机对照试验中,检验基于理论的 Thinking Healthy Programme Peer-delivered(THPP)三种中介因素,该方案是一种针对围产期抑郁的循证心理社会干预措施,对症状严重程度的影响。
参与者包括年龄≥18 岁的孕妇,其抑郁程度为中度至重度,根据患者健康问卷 9(PHQ-9)得分≥10 来定义,随机分配至 THPP 或增强常规护理组。我们检验了三个预先指定的变量(患者激活、社会支持和母婴依恋)在产后 3 个月时是否在产后 6 个月时对 THPP 干预围产期抑郁症状严重程度(PHQ-9)的主要终点产生影响。我们首先在每个试验内进行个体中介检验(印度 n=280,巴基斯坦 n=570),然后对两个试验进行汇总分析(N=850)。
在两个试验内和汇总分析中,患者在产后 3 个月时的激活和支持独立中介了干预对产后 6 个月时抑郁症状严重程度的影响,分别占 THPP 总效应的 23.6%和 18.2%。干预对母婴依恋评分没有影响,因此没有证据表明该因素中介了干预效果。
在这两个背景下,心理社会干预对母亲的抑郁结局的影响均由相同的两个因素介导,这表明,此类旨在缓解围产期抑郁的干预措施应同时针对社会支持和患者激活水平。
无。