Hammerle Miriam, Swan Alicia A, Nelson Jeremy T, Treleaven Julia M
Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital, San Antonio, Texas.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jul;42(6):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
This study aimed to assess the outcomes of 2 treatments for patients with dizziness after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who demonstrate abnormal cervical spine proprioception (CSP).
A retrospective records review was conducted on the medical charts of patients treated for dizziness after mTBI who received either standard care (vestibular rehabilitation therapy [VRT]) or cervical spine proprioceptive retraining (CSPR) from 2009 to 2013. All patients included in the analysis were active-duty military with recurring dizziness after mTBI who had at least 1 abnormal CSP test. Patients were excluded for dizziness with a clear peripheral vestibular or central symptom origin, incomplete data, or no CSP assessment, or if both treatments were administered. Forty-eight total patients were included in the final dataset (22 VRT; 26 CSPR). Traditional VRT was compared with CSPR when abnormal CSP tests were present, regardless of the presence or absence of neck pain. A clinician review of records was used to determine improvement of dizziness based on patient reports of symptoms at discharge evaluation (ie, no symptoms for at least 2 weeks).
Patients who received CSPR were 30 times more likely to report improvement in dizziness symptoms compared with those who received VRT (adjusted odds ratio: 30.12; 95% confidence interval 4.44-204.26, P < .001) when abnormal CSP tests were present. Patients with dizziness over 1 year were significantly less likely to improve.
These results suggest that patients with dizziness after mTBI and who had abnormal CSP assessments responded better to CSPR compared with those who received VRT.
本研究旨在评估两种治疗方法对轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后出现头晕且颈椎本体感觉(CSP)异常患者的疗效。
对2009年至2013年因mTBI后头晕接受标准护理(前庭康复治疗[VRT])或颈椎本体感觉再训练(CSPR)治疗的患者病历进行回顾性记录审查。纳入分析的所有患者均为现役军人,mTBI后反复头晕且至少有1项CSP测试异常。排除有明确外周前庭或中枢症状来源的头晕、数据不完整、未进行CSP评估或接受了两种治疗的患者。最终数据集共纳入48例患者(22例接受VRT;26例接受CSPR)。当存在异常CSP测试时,无论是否存在颈部疼痛,将传统VRT与CSPR进行比较。通过临床医生对记录的审查,根据出院评估时患者的症状报告(即至少2周无症状)来确定头晕是否改善。
当存在异常CSP测试时,接受CSPR的患者报告头晕症状改善的可能性是接受VRT患者的30倍(调整后的优势比:30.12;95%置信区间4.44 - 204.26,P <.001)。头晕超过1年的患者改善的可能性显著降低。
这些结果表明,mTBI后头晕且CSP评估异常的患者与接受VRT的患者相比,对CSPR的反应更好。