Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Worldcup-ro 164, Yongtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Worldcup-ro 164, Yongtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Clin Radiol. 2019 Oct;74(10):817.e15-817.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
To compare the diagnostic performance of abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and full diagnostic MRI with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in patients with a personal history of breast cancer and to evaluate how the kinetic features affect the performance of two radiologists.
Between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017, 3,834 breast MRI examinations in 2,310 patients with a history of breast cancer comprised the study population. MRI images were reviewed retrospectively by two radiologists. First, two radiologists independently reviewed T1-weighted images scanned at 90 seconds after the contrast medium injection and T2-weighted images. After 6 months, the two readers reviewed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images with five consecutive delayed images using CAD. The diagnostic performance of the abbreviated-sequence and full-sequence MRI were compared.
Fifty-one intramammary recurrences were detected with breast MRI in 47 patients. Of the 51 tumour recurrences, 36 (70.6%) lesions occurred >3 years after initial cancer surgery and seven (13.7%) lesions at <2 years after initial surgery. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.2-94.1% and 97.6-98.6% on the abbreviated sequence and 94.1-96.1% and 97.9-98.3% on the full diagnostic MRI. Of 51 malignant lesions, six showed delayed persistent pattern, of which three lesions were non-mass enhancement and three lesions were small enhancing masses <1 cm.
Overall diagnostic performances of abbreviated MRI and full diagnostic MRI were similar in both readers. The CAD-generated kinetic features could affect reader performance and the sensitivity could be improved or the specificity improved according to the reader.
比较简化磁共振成像(MRI)和全诊断 MRI 与计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统在有乳腺癌个人病史患者中的诊断性能,并评估动力学特征如何影响两位放射科医生的表现。
2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日,纳入 2310 例有乳腺癌病史的患者共 3834 次乳腺 MRI 检查作为研究对象。回顾性分析 MRI 图像,由两位放射科医生独立进行。首先,两位放射科医生分别独立分析造影后 90 秒的 T1 加权图像和 T2 加权图像,6 个月后,使用 CAD 分析 5 张连续延迟图像的增强 T1 加权图像。比较简化序列和全序列 MRI 的诊断性能。
51 例患者在乳腺 MRI 上检测到 51 例乳腺内复发。51 个肿瘤复发中,36 个(70.6%)病变发生在初始癌症手术后>3 年,7 个(13.7%)病变发生在初始手术后<2 年。简化序列的敏感性和特异性分别为 92.2-94.1%和 97.6-98.6%,全诊断 MRI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 94.1-96.1%和 97.9-98.3%。在 51 个恶性病变中,6 个表现为延迟持续模式,其中 3 个病变是非肿块样增强,3 个病变是<1cm 的小增强肿块。
两位放射科医生简化 MRI 和全诊断 MRI 的总体诊断性能相似。CAD 生成的动力学特征可能会影响读者的表现,根据读者的需求,敏感性可以提高,特异性可以提高。