• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从敷衍了事到黑匣子:手术室安全的演变。

From box ticking to the black box: the evolution of operating room safety.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1369-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02886-5. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02886-5
PMID:31363833
Abstract

PURPOSE

Efforts to improve the safety of patients in the operating room have focused on mitigating harm through the standardization of system, team, and human level factors. This article highlights existing and future methods for enhancing safety in the perioperative setting, and the theory and principles that underpin them.

METHODS

Evidence surrounding the development and implementation of select surgical safety interventions is discussed.

RESULTS

Work in human factors and engineering that has inspired safety interventions such as the WHO Safety Checklist, and more recently operating room recorders, represents a movement away from traditional, retrospective or reactive methods of studying surgical safety, to prospective and proactive ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Future work will examine the effectiveness of these interventions for improving patient outcomes and minimizing iatrogenic harm.

摘要

目的

为提高手术室患者安全性,人们一直致力于通过标准化系统、团队和人为因素来减少伤害。本文重点介绍围手术期安全增强的现有和未来方法,以及支撑这些方法的理论和原则。

方法

讨论了选定手术安全干预措施的制定和实施情况。

结果

启发了安全干预措施(如世卫组织安全检查表)的人类因素和工程学方面的工作,以及最近的手术室记录器,代表了从传统的、回顾性或反应性的手术安全性研究方法向前瞻性和主动性方法的转变。

结论

未来的工作将研究这些干预措施在改善患者预后和最大限度减少医源性伤害方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
From box ticking to the black box: the evolution of operating room safety.从敷衍了事到黑匣子:手术室安全的演变。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1369-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02886-5. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Reducing perioperative harm in New Zealand: the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, briefings and debriefings, and venous thrombembolism prophylaxis.减少新西兰围手术期伤害:世界卫生组织手术安全核对表、术前简报和术后汇报以及静脉血栓栓塞预防
N Z Med J. 2015 Oct 30;128(1424):54-67.
3
Use of the surgical safety checklist to improve communication and reduce complications.使用手术安全核对表来改善沟通并减少并发症。
J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist.30 天的结果支持实施手术安全检查表。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Dec;215(6):766-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Increasing compliance with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist-A regional health system's experience.提高对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性——一个区域卫生系统的经验
Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
Effect of implementation of a surgical safety checklist on perioperative and postoperative complications at an academic institution in North America.手术安全核对表的实施对北美一所学术机构围手术期及术后并发症的影响。
Vet Surg. 2018 Nov;47(8):1052-1065. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12964. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
7
A mixed methods study of challenges in the implementation and use of the surgical safety checklist.一项关于手术安全检查表实施和使用中挑战的混合方法研究。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):832-837. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
8
Operating room black box: GIMMICK or a patient safety tool?手术室黑匣子:噱头还是患者安全工具?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Apr;74(4 (Supple-4)):S85-S89. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.AKU-9S-13.
9
[Patient safety in the operating room. Checklist implementation of general surgery].[手术室中的患者安全。普通外科手术核对清单的实施]
Rev Enferm. 2012 May;35(5):22-4, 26-30.
10
Effect of surgical safety checklists on pediatric surgical complications in Ontario.手术安全检查表对安大略省小儿外科并发症的影响。
CMAJ. 2016 Jun 14;188(9):E191-E198. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151333. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective.团队合作和非技术技能对改善急诊手术结果的作用:国际视角
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Feb 8;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00317-w.
2
Patient Safety in the Operating Room During Urologic Surgery: The OR Black Box Experience.泌尿科手术中手术室的患者安全:OR 黑盒体验。
World J Surg. 2021 Nov;45(11):3306-3312. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06251-9. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Surgical safety.手术安全

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying recall bias in surgical safety: a need for a modern approach to morbidity and mortality reviews.量化手术安全中的回忆偏倚:对发病率和死亡率审查的现代方法的需求。
Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):39-43. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017317.
2
Mortality Trends After a Voluntary Checklist-based Surgical Safety Collaborative.自愿基于清单的手术安全协作后的死亡率趋势。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):923-929. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002249.
3
Using Data to Enhance Performance and Improve Quality and Safety in Surgery.利用数据提升手术性能、改善质量与安全。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1349-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03249-1.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):972-973. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888.
4
Telementoring and Telesurgery for Minimally Invasive Procedures.远程指导和微创手术远程操作。
J Urol. 2018 Feb;199(2):355-369. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.082. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Are We Ready for Our Close-up?: Why and How We Must Embrace Video in the OR.我们准备好特写镜头了吗?:为何以及如何在手术室中采用视频技术
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):934-936. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002232.
6
The Surgeon as the Second Victim? Results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons' Attitude (BISA) Study.外科医生是否也是“第二受害者”?波士顿术中不良事件外科医生态度(BISA)研究结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jun;224(6):1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.039. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
7
Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.腹疝管理:基于系统评价的专家共识
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
8
Video Coaching as an Efficient Teaching Method for Surgical Residents-A Randomized Controlled Trial.视频辅导作为外科住院医师的一种高效教学方法——一项随机对照试验
J Surg Educ. 2017 Mar-Apr;74(2):365-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
Postoperative Adverse Events Inconsistently Improved by the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: A Systematic Literature Review of 25 Studies.世界卫生组织手术安全核对表对术后不良事件的改善效果不一:25项研究的系统文献综述
World J Surg. 2016 Aug;40(8):1842-58. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3519-9.
10
Measuring to Improve: Peer and Crowd-sourced Assessments of Technical Skill with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.为改进而衡量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术技术技能的同行和众包评估
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):547-550. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.028. Epub 2016 Jan 2.