• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达格列净(SGLT2 抑制剂)与沙格列汀(DPP4 抑制剂)相比在血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中的血糖控制持久性。

Durability of glycaemic control with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared with saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Section of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2564-2569. doi: 10.1111/dom.13841. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/dom.13841
PMID:31364269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6851837/
Abstract

Dapagliflozin is associated with greater reductions in HbA1c and weight than saxagliptin in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present post hoc analyses compared the durability of these effects over short- and long-term follow-up in patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with metformin (≥1500 mg/day) and who were receiving either dapagliflozin (10 mg/day) or saxagliptin (5 mg/day). Failure of glycaemiccontrol was assessed using the slope of the change in HbA1c from baseline-over-time regression line (coefficient of failure [CoF]). CoF was compared directly (dapagliflozin vs saxagliptin) over the short term (NCT01606007, 24 weeks) and indirectly (placebo-adjusted) over the long term (NCT00528879 and NCT00121667, 102 weeks). A low CoF value indicated greater durability. CoF was lower for dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin over 18-24 weeks (-1.38%/year; 95% CI, -2.41 to -0.35; P = .009) and 20-102 weeks (-0.37%/year; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.02; P = .04). Fewer dapagliflozin-treated patients versus saxagliptin-treated patients required rescue medication or discontinued the study because of failure to achieve glycaemic control at 24 weeks (3.4% vs 9.4%; P = .0191). In patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with metformin, dapagliflozin was associated with greater durability of glycaemic control than saxagliptin over 18-24 and 20-102 weeks.

摘要

达格列净与沙格列汀相比,在二甲双胍控制不佳(≥1500mg/天)的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,能更显著降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和体重。本事后分析比较了这些疗效在接受达格列净(10mg/天)或沙格列汀(5mg/天)治疗的 T2DM 患者短期和长期随访中的持久性。采用从基线到时间回归线的 HbA1c 变化斜率(失效系数 [CoF])评估血糖控制失败。直接比较 CoF(达格列净 vs 沙格列汀)短期(NCT01606007,24 周)和间接(安慰剂调整)长期(NCT00528879 和 NCT00121667,102 周)。CoF 值较低表示持久性较好。达格列净治疗组的 CoF 低于沙格列汀治疗组,在 18-24 周时为-1.38%/年(95%CI,-2.41 至-0.35;P=0.009),在 20-102 周时为-0.37%/年(95%CI,-0.73 至-0.02;P=0.04)。在 24 周时,达格列净治疗组与沙格列汀治疗组相比,需要挽救药物或因血糖控制失败而停止研究的患者较少(3.4%比 9.4%;P=0.0191)。在二甲双胍控制不佳的 T2DM 患者中,达格列净在 18-24 周和 20-102 周时,血糖控制的持久性优于沙格列汀。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d560/6851837/bc2d69e60c7a/DOM-21-2564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d560/6851837/25ac3334c78f/DOM-21-2564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d560/6851837/bc2d69e60c7a/DOM-21-2564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d560/6851837/25ac3334c78f/DOM-21-2564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d560/6851837/bc2d69e60c7a/DOM-21-2564-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Durability of glycaemic control with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared with saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.达格列净(SGLT2 抑制剂)与沙格列汀(DPP4 抑制剂)相比在血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中的血糖控制持久性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2564-2569. doi: 10.1111/dom.13841. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.达格列净与沙格列汀作为二甲双胍治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的附加疗法比较
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Aug;62(4):424-430. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000056.
3
Albuminuria-lowering effect of dapagliflozin alone and in combination with saxagliptin and effect of dapagliflozin and saxagliptin on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (DELIGHT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.达格列净单药及联合沙格列汀降低蛋白尿的效果及在 2 型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者中的血糖控制效果(DELIGHT):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):429-441. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30086-5. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
4
Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin vs monotherapy as added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.达格列净联合沙格列汀与单药治疗作为二甲双胍附加治疗用于2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21409. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021409.
5
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial of Triple Therapy With Dapagliflozin Add-on to Saxagliptin Plus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes.达格列净添加至沙格列汀和二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的随机、双盲、3 期试验
Diabetes Care. 2015 Nov;38(11):2009-17. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0779. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
6
Saxagliptin/Dapagliflozin: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.沙格列汀/达格列净:用于 2 型糖尿病的治疗。
Drugs. 2017 Mar;77(3):319-330. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0697-1.
7
Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.心力衰竭风险分层与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 5;140(19):1569-1577. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042685. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
One-year efficacy and safety of saxagliptin add-on in patients receiving dapagliflozin and metformin.达格列净和二甲双胍联合治疗患者加用沙格列汀的一年疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Nov;18(11):1128-1133. doi: 10.1111/dom.12741. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.在二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳的患者中,达格列净与格列吡嗪作为附加疗法的血糖疗效2年耐久性比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Nov;16(11):1111-20. doi: 10.1111/dom.12327. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.达格列净或达格列净联合沙格列汀与格列美脲作为 2 型糖尿病患者二甲双胍的附加治疗的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2598-2607. doi: 10.1111/dom.13437. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Durability of glucose-lowering effect of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A real-world data study.度拉糖肽治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的降糖效果持久性:一项真实世界数据研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 31;13:1032793. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1032793. eCollection 2022.
2
An Overview of the Cardiorenal Protective Mechanisms of SGLT2 Inhibitors.SGLT2 抑制剂的心脏-肾脏保护机制概述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 26;23(7):3651. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073651.
3
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) Inhibitors for New-Onset Dementia: A Propensity Score-Matched Population-Based Study With Competing Risk Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.达格列净与沙格列汀作为二甲双胍治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的附加疗法比较
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Aug;62(4):424-430. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000056.
2
Short and medium-term efficacy of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂的短期和中期疗效:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1213-1222. doi: 10.1111/dom.13221. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
3
Durability of response to dapagliflozin: a review of long-term efficacy and safety.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4(DPP4)抑制剂治疗新发痴呆症的比较:一项基于倾向评分匹配的人群研究及竞争风险分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 21;8:747620. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.747620. eCollection 2021.
4
Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin vs monotherapy as added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.达格列净联合沙格列汀与单药治疗作为二甲双胍附加治疗用于2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21409. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021409.
达格列净治疗反应的持久性:长期疗效与安全性综述
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1685-1696. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1354822. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
The Place of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Therapeutics: A "Me Too" or "the Special One" Antidiabetic Class?二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂在2型糖尿病治疗中的地位:是“me too”类还是“独特”的抗糖尿病药物类别?
J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:806979. doi: 10.1155/2015/806979. Epub 2015 May 17.
5
Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin.二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病的双联附加治疗:一项比较沙格列汀加达格列净双联附加治疗与沙格列汀或达格列净单药附加治疗加至二甲双胍的随机、双盲试验。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar;38(3):376-83. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1142. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Study to determine the durability of glycaemic control with early treatment with a vildagliptin-metformin combination regimen vs. standard-of-care metformin monotherapy-the VERIFY trial: a randomized double-blind trial.研究比较维格列汀-二甲双胍联合治疗方案早期治疗与标准治疗二甲双胍单药治疗对血糖控制的持久性——VERIFY试验:一项随机双盲试验。
Diabet Med. 2014 Oct;31(10):1178-84. doi: 10.1111/dme.12508. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
7
Long-term safety and efficacy of empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and metformin: an active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, 78-week open-label extension study in patients with type 2 diabetes.恩格列净、西格列汀和二甲双胍的长期安全性及疗效:一项针对2型糖尿病患者的活性对照、平行组、随机、78周开放标签扩展研究。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):4015-21. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0663. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
8
Overview of methods for comparing the efficacies of drugs in the absence of head-to-head clinical trial data.在缺乏直接头对头临床试验数据的情况下比较药物疗效的方法概述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;77(1):116-21. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12150.
9
Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial.卡格列净对比西格列汀治疗二甲双胍联合磺脲类药物血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者:一项 52 周随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2508-15. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2491. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
10
Dapagliflozin add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 102-week trial.达格列净添加治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 102 周试验。
BMC Med. 2013 Feb 20;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-43.