评估外科专业学会的“明智选择”推荐。
Assessment of Surgical Specialty Societies' Choosing Wisely Recommendations.
机构信息
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
出版信息
JAMA Surg. 2019 Oct 1;154(10):971-973. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2309.
Abstract
This research study assesses Choosing Wisely deimplementation recommendations from surgical specialty societies to ascertain how many are directly applicable to surgical procedures or under surgeons’ control.
摘要
本研究评估了外科专业学会的明智选择（Choosing Wisely）去实施建议，以确定有多少建议直接适用于外科手术或在外科医生的控制之下。
相似文献
1
Assessment of Surgical Specialty Societies' Choosing Wisely Recommendations.评估外科专业学会的“明智选择”推荐。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Oct 1;154(10):971-973. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2309.
2
Choosing Wisely concept has universal appeal.明智选择理念具有广泛的吸引力。
CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E276. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5291. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
APMA Partners with ABIM Foundation's Choosing Wisely Campaign.美国足病医学协会与美国内科医学委员会基金会的“明智选择”运动合作。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2018 Jan;108(1):81. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-108.1.81.
4
[Response to and further development of the Choosing wisely initiative].[对“明智选择”倡议的回应及进一步发展]
Internist (Berl). 2017 Jun;58(6):527-531. doi: 10.1007/s00108-017-0246-8.
5
[The Choosing Wisely Initiative (CWI): Background, aims and problems of a professional campaign against oversupply].[明智选择倡议（CWI）：反对供应过剩的专业活动的背景、目标和问题]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Dec;129:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
[Choosing wisely recommendations in gastroenterology].[胃肠病学中的明智选择建议]
Internist (Berl). 2017 Jun;58(6):539-544. doi: 10.1007/s00108-017-0245-9.
7
[Toward a "Choosing Wisely" Future in Medicine].迈向医学领域“明智选择”的未来
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2019;139(4):547-550. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00181-1.
8
Choosing Wisely: 10 practices to stop-or adopt-to reduce overuse in health care.明智选择：10项停止或采用的做法，以减少医疗保健中的过度使用。
J Fam Pract. 2020 Oct;69(8):396-400.
9
The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign.意大利内科医学学会明智选择行动
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;11(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1560-1. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Physician perceptions of Choosing Wisely and drivers of overuse.医生对“明智选择”及过度医疗驱动因素的看法。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(5):337-43.
引用本文的文献
1
A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.《基于价值的专科护理外科医生指南》
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 25;10(4):e70239. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70239. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Building climate resilience and mitigating the impact of climate change on cancer care: strategies and solutions for low and middle income countries.增强气候适应力并减轻气候变化对癌症护理的影响：低收入和中等收入国家的策略与解决方案
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02004-4.
3
Downstream Effects of Omission of Axillary Surgery in Older Adults with Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.早期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌老年患者省略腋窝手术的下游效应
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17196-x.
4
Overcoming inertia: Provider perspectives on de-implementation strategies in preoperative testing.克服惰性：医疗服务提供者对术前检查中去实施策略的看法
Am J Surg. 2025 Apr;242:116228. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116228. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
Implementation of Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Lymph Node Surgery in Male Breast Cancer.明智选择推荐在男性乳腺癌淋巴结手术中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7641-7653. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15811-x. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
6
Prophylactic Intra-abdominal Drains in Major Elective Surgeries: A Comprehensive Review.大型择期手术中的预防性腹腔引流：全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Feb 12;16(2):e54056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54056. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
A Prospective Study of Sentinel Node Biopsy Omission in Women Age ≥ 65 Years with ER+ Breast Cancer.年龄≥65 岁、ER 阳性乳腺癌女性哨兵淋巴结活检省略的前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3160-3167. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15000-w. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术后再次切除术和改行乳房切除术的比率及相关医疗保健费用的当代分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3649-3660. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14902-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Behavioral Interventions on Surgeons' Preoperative Decision-Making: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis.行为干预对外科医生术前决策的影响：系统评价和批判性分析。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:547-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.037. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
10
A Health Systems Ethical Framework for De-implementation in Health Care.卫生系统去落实框架：医疗保健中的伦理问题
J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
本文引用的文献
1
Choosing Wisely Campaign: Valuable For Providers Who Knew About It, But Awareness Remained Constant, 2014-17.明智选择活动：对了解该活动的提供者有价值，但意识保持不变，2014-17 年。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Nov;36(11):2005-2011. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0945. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
Choosing Wisely: How To Fulfill The Promise In The Next 5 Years.明智选择：如何在未来 5 年内实现这一承诺。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Nov;36(11):2012-2018. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0953. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Interventions Aimed at Reducing Use of Low-Value Health Services: A Systematic Review.旨在减少低价值医疗服务使用的干预措施：一项系统评价
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):507-550. doi: 10.1177/1077558716656970. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.早期趋势在明智选择运动的七个建议中。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1913-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441.
5
Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services.明智选择——低价值服务的标签化的政治和经济。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):589-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1314965. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Zotero 插件