Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co, Ltd, Medical Affairs, Tokyo, Japan.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;76(10):1052-1062. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1702.
Recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing clozapine with nonclozapine second-generation antipsychotics (NC-SGAs) in schizophrenia have challenged clozapine's superiority in treatment-resistant patients. However, patients in RCTs are not necessarily generalizable to those in clinical practice.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare various outcomes of clozapine vs oral NC-SGAs in cohort studies.
Systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL without language restriction from database inception until December 17, 2018.
Nonrandomized cohort studies reporting effectiveness and/or safety outcomes comparing clozapine with NC-SGAs in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Independent investigators assessed studies and extracted data. Using a random-effects model, the study calculated risk ratio (RR) unadjusted for covariates and follow-up duration, number needed to treat/number needed to harm (NNT/NNH) for dichotomous data, and standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) for continuous data.
Coprimary outcomes were hospitalization and all-cause discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included all effectiveness and safety outcomes reported in at least 3 analyzable studies.
Of 8446 hits, 68 articles from 63 individual cohort studies (n = 109 341) (60.3% male; mean [SD] age of 38.8 [6.5] years, illness duration of 11.0 [5.1] years, and study duration of 19.1 [23.3] months) were meta-analyzed. Compared with NC-SGAs, despite greater illness severity (17 studies [n = 38 766]; Hedges g, 0.222; 95% CI, 0.013-0.430; P = .04), clozapine was significantly associated with lower hospitalization risk (19 studies [n = 49 453]; RR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.725-0.920; P = .001; NNT, 18; 95% CI, 12-40) and all-cause discontinuation (16 studies [n = 56 368]; RR, 0.732; 95% CI, 0.639-0.838; P < .001; NNT, 8; 95% CI, 6-12). Associations were statistically significant for comparisons with quetiapine fumarate and aripiprazole regarding hospitalization and all NC-SGAs, except aripiprazole, for all-cause discontinuation. Clozapine was also significantly associated with better outcomes regarding overall symptoms (SMD, -0.302; 95% CI, -0.572 to -0.032; P = .03) and Clinical Global Impressions scale severity (SMD, -1.182; 95% CI, -2.243 to -0.122; P = .03). Clozapine was significantly associated with increases in body weight (MD, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.31-3.08 kg; P = .02), body mass index (MD, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.24-1.68; P = .009), and type 2 diabetes (RR, 1.777; 95% CI, 1.229-2.570; P = .002; NNH, 27; 95% CI, 13-90).
In cohort studies, despite more severely ill patients being treated with clozapine, use of clozapine was associated with better key efficacy outcomes and higher cardiometabolic-related risk outcomes vs NC-SGAs.
最近对氯氮平与非氯氮平第二代抗精神病药(NC-SGA)治疗精神分裂症的随机临床试验(RCT)的荟萃分析对氯氮平在治疗抵抗患者中的优势提出了挑战。然而,RCT 中的患者不一定适用于临床实践中的患者。
进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较队列研究中氯氮平与口服 NC-SGA 治疗的各种结局。
系统检索 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL,无语言限制,检索时间从数据库建立到 2018 年 12 月 17 日。
非随机队列研究,报告了氯氮平与精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的 NC-SGA 比较的有效性和/或安全性结局。
独立研究者评估了研究并提取了数据。使用随机效应模型,该研究计算了未经协变量和随访时间调整的风险比(RR)、二分类数据的需要治疗/需要危害人数(NNT/NNH)和连续数据的标准化均数差(SMD)或均数差(MD)。
主要结局是住院和全因停药。次要结局包括至少有 3 项可分析研究报告的所有有效性和安全性结局。
在 8446 项研究中,有 68 篇文章来自 63 项单独的队列研究(n=109341)(60.3%为男性;平均[SD]年龄 38.8[6.5]岁,疾病持续时间 11.0[5.1]年,研究持续时间 19.1[23.3]个月)进行了荟萃分析。与 NC-SGA 相比,尽管疾病严重程度更高(17 项研究[n=38766];Hedges g,0.222;95%置信区间,0.013-0.430;P=0.04),但氯氮平与较低的住院风险显著相关(19 项研究[n=49453];RR,0.817;95%置信区间,0.725-0.920;P=0.001;NNT,18;95%置信区间,12-40)和全因停药(16 项研究[n=56368];RR,0.732;95%置信区间,0.639-0.838;P<0.001;NNT,8;95%置信区间,6-12)。与喹硫平富马酸盐和阿立哌唑相比,氯氮平与住院和所有 NC-SGA 相关的全因停药的关联具有统计学意义,除了阿立哌唑。氯氮平还与总体症状(SMD,-0.302;95%置信区间,-0.572 至-0.032;P=0.03)和临床总体印象量表严重程度(SMD,-1.182;95%置信区间,-2.243 至-0.122;P=0.03)的改善显著相关。氯氮平与体重增加(MD,1.70;95%置信区间,0.31-3.08 kg;P=0.02)、体重指数(MD,0.96;95%置信区间,0.24-1.68;P=0.009)和 2 型糖尿病(RR,1.777;95%置信区间,1.229-2.570;P=0.002;NNH,27;95%置信区间,13-90)的风险显著相关。
在队列研究中,尽管病情更严重的患者使用氯氮平治疗,但与 NC-SGA 相比,使用氯氮平与更好的关键疗效结局和更高的心脏代谢相关风险结局相关。