J. Youm is assistant dean of education compliance and quality and adjunct assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California. J. Corral is associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S69-S72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002912.
This study aimed to empirically assess medical educator knowledge of pedagogy and technology to inform the direction of faculty development efforts.
The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework survey is a validated instrument for understanding educators' knowledge of content (CK), pedagogy (PK), and technology (TK) in teaching. A modified version of the TPACK was administered to medical educators (N = 76) at 2 public institutions: University of California, Irvine School of Medicine (UC Irvine); and University of Colorado School of Medicine (CU).
An independent-samples t test compared TK with PK and CK within each institution. The means of TK (UC Irvine: 3.4; CU: 3.4) and both PK for didactic sessions (UC Irvine: 3.9; CU: 4.4) and PK for clinical settings (UC Irvine: 4.0; CU: 4.4) were compared using a t test and statistically different, P < .01. Similarly, the means of TK and CK (UC Irvine: 4.5; CU: 4.7) were statistically different, P < .01. A Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated that the CU PK for a didactic session (mean: 4.4) was greater than the UC Irvine PK for a didactic session (mean: 3.9), P < .01. Similarly, the CU PK for a clinical setting (mean: 4.4) was greater than the UC Irvine PK for a clinical setting (mean: 4.0), P < .01.
There is a clear need for faculty development programs for medical educators to focus on how to teach with technology if medical schools continue to adopt technology within their curricula.
本研究旨在通过实证评估医学教育者的教学法和技术知识,为师资发展工作指明方向。
技术教学内容知识(TPACK)框架调查是一种用于了解教育者在教学中对内容(CK)、教学法(PK)和技术(TK)知识的有效工具。对两所公立学校(加州大学欧文分校医学院[UC Irvine]和科罗拉多大学医学院[CU])的医学教育者(N=76)进行了经过修改的 TPACK 测试。
在每个机构内,独立样本 t 检验比较了 TK 与 PK 和 CK。在 UC Irvine 和 CU,TK 的平均值分别为 3.4 和 3.4,同时 PK 在理论课程中的平均值分别为 3.9 和 4.4,PK 在临床环境中的平均值分别为 4.0 和 4.4,这些数据用 t 检验进行比较,结果均有统计学差异(P<.01)。同样,TK 和 CK 的平均值(UC Irvine:4.5;CU:4.7)也存在统计学差异(P<.01)。Wilcoxon 秩和检验表明,CU 的理论课程 PK(均值:4.4)大于 UC Irvine 的理论课程 PK(均值:3.9)(P<.01)。同样,CU 的临床环境 PK(均值:4.4)大于 UC Irvine 的临床环境 PK(均值:4.0)(P<.01)。
如果医学院校继续在课程中采用技术,那么医学教育者的师资发展计划显然需要将重点放在如何使用技术进行教学上。