Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
STATinMED Research, Plano, TX, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2159-2168. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1651129. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
To address gaps in the literature on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with schizophrenia and prior hospitalization who transition from oral risperidone or paliperidone (oral ris/pali) to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in a real-world setting by comparing treatment patterns, HRU, and costs 12-months pre- and post-transition to PP1M among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients affected by schizophrenia who have had ≥1 hospitalization. VHA patients with schizophrenia (aged ≥18 years) who initiated oral ris/pali, had ≥1 all-cause inpatient stay, and transitioned to PP1M from January 2015-March 2017 were included from the VHA database. The first transition date to PP1M was identified as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous health plan eligibility for 12 months pre- and post-PP1M. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar's test, as appropriate. The study included 319 patients (mean [SD] age = 51.6 [4.2] years) during 12 months of baseline and follow-up. During pre-PP1M transition, 7.2% of the patients were adherent (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%) to oral ris/pali. Post-PP1M transition, 27.6% of the patients were adherent to PP1M. Comparison of HRU outcomes from the pre- to post-PP1M transition revealed significantly lower all-cause inpatient stays (3.5 vs 1.4, < .0001) and shorter inpatient length of stay (43.4 vs 18.3 days, < .0001). Similar trends were seen for mental health and schizophrenia-related HRU. Cost outcome comparison indicated significantly lower all-cause inpatient costs ($64,702 vs $24,147, < .0001), total medical costs ($87,917 vs $56,947, < .0001), and total costs ($91,181 vs $69,106, < .0001). A similar trend was observed for mental health and schizophrenia-related costs. Transitioning from oral ris/pali to PP1M may significantly improve HRU and provide potential cost savings in VHA patients with schizophrenia and ≥1 prior hospitalization.
为了填补文献中关于精神分裂症患者从口服利培酮或帕利哌酮(口服利培酮/帕利哌酮)转为每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮(PP1M)后的医疗资源利用(HRU)和成本方面的空白,本研究比较了退伍军人事务部(VA)数据库中接受过≥1 次住院治疗的精神分裂症患者在转为 PP1M 前后 12 个月的治疗模式、HRU 和成本。研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月期间从口服利培酮/帕利哌酮转为 PP1M 的≥18 岁精神分裂症 VA 患者,这些患者有≥1 次全因住院记录。将首次转为 PP1M 的日期定义为索引日期。患者在 PP1M 前后 12 个月必须连续参加健康计划。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验和 McNemar 检验比较结果,视情况而定。本研究纳入了 319 例患者(平均[SD]年龄 51.6[4.2]岁),在基线和随访期间进行了 12 个月的研究。在转为 PP1M 之前的过渡阶段,有 7.2%的患者(比例覆盖天数[PDC]≥80%)对口服利培酮/帕利哌酮的依从性较好。转为 PP1M 后,有 27.6%的患者对 PP1M 的依从性较好。与 PP1M 前相比,PP1M 后的 HRU 结果显示全因住院治疗次数明显减少(3.5 次 vs 1.4 次,<.0001),住院时间明显缩短(43.4 天 vs 18.3 天,<.0001)。精神卫生和精神分裂症相关 HRU 也出现了类似的趋势。成本结果比较表明,全因住院费用(64702 美元 vs 24147 美元,<.0001)、总医疗费用(87917 美元 vs 56947 美元,<.0001)和总费用(91181 美元 vs 69106 美元,<.0001)均显著降低。精神卫生和精神分裂症相关费用也呈现出类似的趋势。从口服利培酮/帕利哌酮转为 PP1M 可能显著改善 HRU,并为有≥1 次既往住院治疗的 VA 精神分裂症患者节省潜在成本。