Suppr超能文献

采用外侧入路对 Gustilo I 型和 II 型开放性 Pilon 骨折进行切开复位内固定术。

Open reduction and internal fixation of Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures using a lateral approach.

作者信息

Hu Chuanzhen, Zhu Weiyi, Chahal Kapil, Zhu Nan, Fang Wang, Jing Juehua, Zhan Junfeng

机构信息

1 Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

2 Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Sep-Dec;27(3):2309499019864722. doi: 10.1177/2309499019864722.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional anteromedial incision for pilon fractures would further increase the damage to the subcutaneous tissues anterior and medial to tibia. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the method and the outcomes of lateral approach for surgical treatment of Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures with medial soft tissue injuries.

METHODS

From May 2014 to September 2017, 35 patients with Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures were treated with standard protocol using a lateral approach. The initial wound debridement and application of a spanning external fixator or traction of calcaneal tubercle were performed within 24 h and a definitive fixation was performed when the wound was healed. The mean time from primary surgery to definite surgery was 11.8 (range: 8-16) days. Postoperative radiographs, complications, bone union, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hind foot score were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range: 13-23). The average time to bone union was 22 weeks (range: 18-25). In 35 patients, 2 patients had a superficial wound infection and another 1 patient showed limitation of ankle joint motion. No cases of deep infection, skin necrosis, and symptomatic implant reported. The mean AOFAS score was 89.8 (range: 84-95). On final outcome, 25 patients come under excellent and 10 patients had good result.

CONCLUSION

From the results of this study, we can conclude that the lateral approach to treat Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures was a safe option with a low complication rate. On the other hand, it provides sufficient exposure to restore anatomic articulation, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

摘要

背景

传统的用于治疗Pilon骨折的前内侧切口会进一步增加胫骨前侧和内侧皮下组织的损伤。在本研究中,我们回顾性评估了外侧入路手术治疗伴有内侧软组织损伤的Gustilo I型和II型开放性Pilon骨折的方法及疗效。

方法

2014年5月至2017年9月,35例Gustilo I型和II型开放性Pilon骨折患者采用外侧入路按标准方案进行治疗。在24小时内进行初始伤口清创并应用跨越外固定架或跟骨结节牵引,伤口愈合后进行确定性固定。初次手术至确定性手术的平均时间为11.8天(范围:8 - 16天)。记录术后X线片、并发症、骨愈合情况以及美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝/后足评分。

结果

平均随访期为17个月(范围:13 - 23个月)。平均骨愈合时间为22周(范围:18 - 25周)。35例患者中,2例出现浅表伤口感染,另1例踝关节活动受限。未报告深部感染、皮肤坏死及植入物相关症状的病例。AOFAS平均评分为89.8(范围:84 - 95)。最终结果显示,25例患者结果为优,10例患者结果为良。

结论

从本研究结果可以得出,外侧入路治疗Gustilo I型和II型开放性Pilon骨折是一种安全的选择,并发症发生率低。另一方面,它能提供足够的显露以恢复解剖关节,值得临床推荐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验