Kalinauskiene Egle, Gerviene Dalia, Bacharova Ljuba, Krivosikova Zora, Naudziunas Albinas
Department of Internal Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
International Laser Center, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov;24(6):e12684. doi: 10.1111/anec.12684. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
According to current guidelines, the main indications for PCI in patients with STEMI are ST-segment deviations and defined time from the onset of symptoms. Negative T wave at admission can be a sign of prolonged ischemia or spontaneous reperfusion. In both situations, the urgent intervention is questionable. We evaluated the infarct size and in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients with negative T wave in cases of primary PCI strategy compared with conservative treatment.
A retrospective analysis of 116 STEMI patients with negative T wave at the presenting ECG was performed. Sixty-eight patients (59%) underwent primary PCI strategy (PCI group), and 48 (41%) were treated conservatively (non-PCI group). The infarct size estimated by using the Selvester score, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated.
The difference between Selvester score values at admission and at discharge in the non-PCI group was statistically significant (1.48; 95% CI 0.694-2.27), while no significant difference was observed in the PCI group (-0.07; 95% CI -0.546-0.686). The in-hospital mortality was higher in the non-PCI group; however, the numbers were relatively small: PCI 2 (2.9%) and non-PCI 5 (10.4%).
In this study, we showed a reduction in the infarct size estimated by Selvester score in STEMI patients with negative T wave who were treated conservatively, while there was no significant change in the infarct size after primary PCI strategy. The higher mortality in patients treated conservatively could be attributed to higher age and comorbidities in the non-PCI group. It seems that conservative treatment strategy might be an option in STEMI patients with negative T wave.
根据当前指南,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的主要指征是ST段偏移以及症状发作后的特定时间。入院时T波倒置可能是缺血时间延长或自发再灌注的征象。在这两种情况下,紧急干预是否必要值得怀疑。我们比较了在直接PCI策略下与保守治疗的STEMI伴T波倒置患者的梗死面积和住院死亡率。
对116例入院心电图T波倒置的STEMI患者进行回顾性分析。68例患者(59%)接受直接PCI策略(PCI组),48例(41%)接受保守治疗(非PCI组)。采用塞尔维斯特评分评估梗死面积,并评估住院死亡率。
非PCI组入院时和出院时塞尔维斯特评分值的差异具有统计学意义(1.48;95%可信区间0.694 - 2.27),而PCI组未观察到显著差异(-0.07;95%可信区间-0.546 - 0.686)。非PCI组的住院死亡率较高;然而,数量相对较少:PCI组2例(2.9%),非PCI组5例(10.4%)。
在本研究中,我们发现保守治疗的STEMI伴T波倒置患者,通过塞尔维斯特评分评估的梗死面积有所减小,而直接PCI策略后梗死面积无显著变化。保守治疗患者较高的死亡率可能归因于非PCI组患者年龄较大和合并症较多。对于STEMI伴T波倒置患者,保守治疗策略似乎可能是一种选择。