Yang Guang, Li Ya-Nan, Wang Ning, Nan Heng, Sheng Lu
Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, Luo-yang 471002, Henan Province, China.
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2019 Jul 25;44(7):512-5. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.180536.
To investigate the therapeutic effect of blade needle therapy for cervicogenic dizziness (CD) and changes of blood flow of vertebral artery in patients with CD.
A total of 60 patients with CD were equally randomized into medication (16 women and 14 men, 38.9±10.9 years in age) group and blade needle group (17 women and 13 men, 40.1±12.4 years in age). Patients of the blade needle group were treated by performing blade needle stimulation (longitudinal cutting along the musculoaponeurotic layer) to the tender points (attachment points) of the bilateral superior and inferior oblique muscles of the head, major and minor posterior cephalic rectus, about 2/3 of suboccipital nuchal line, and near the cervical processes of C1-C2 segments. The treatment was conducted once every 3 days for 15 days. Patients of the medication group were ordered to take Flunarizine Hydrochloride capsules (10 mg) once every night for 15 days. Transcranial Doppler was used to measure changes of mean blood flow velocities of the left vertebral artery (LVA), right vertebral artery (RVA), and basilar artery (BA) before and after the treatment. The therapeutic effect was assessed according to (1994) and the (2017).
Following the treatment, of the two 30 cases in the medication and blade needle groups, 5 (16.7%) and 7 (23.3%) were cured, 16 (53.3%) and 20 (66.7%) were improved in their symptoms, 9 (30.0%) and 3 (10.0%) failed, with the effective rate being 70.0% and 90.0%, respectively. The effective rate of the blade needle was significantly superior to that of the medication (<0.05). The scores of vertigo, neck-should pain, daily living and work, psychology, social adaptation, and total score of the assessment scale, as well as the average blood flow velocities of LVA, RVA and BA were considerably increased in both groups in comparison with their own pre-treatment (<0.05), and obviously higher in the blade needle group than in the medication group (<0.05).
Blade needle treatment has a good clinical effect in the treatment of CD patients, which is probably associated with its function in increasing blood perfusion of the brain tissue, and thus being worthy of clinical application.
探讨刃针疗法治疗颈源性眩晕(CD)的疗效及CD患者椎动脉血流变化。
将60例CD患者随机分为药物组(女16例,男14例,年龄38.9±10.9岁)和刃针组(女17例,男13例,年龄40.1±12.4岁),每组各30例。刃针组采用刃针刺激(沿肌筋膜层纵切)双侧头上下斜肌、头后大小直肌的压痛点(附着点),枕下项线约2/3处及C1 - C2节段颈椎横突附近。每3天治疗1次,共治疗15天。药物组患者每晚口服盐酸氟桂利嗪胶囊(10mg),共15天。采用经颅多普勒检测治疗前后左侧椎动脉(LVA)、右侧椎动脉(RVA)及基底动脉(BA)的平均血流速度变化。根据[具体标准1](1994年)和[具体标准2](2017年)评估疗效。
治疗后,药物组和刃针组各30例患者中,治愈分别为5例(16.7%)和7例(23.3%),症状改善分别为16例(53.3%)和20例(66.7%),无效分别为9例(30.0%)和3例(10.0%),有效率分别为70.0%和90.0%。刃针组有效率显著高于药物组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后眩晕、颈肩痛、日常生活及工作、心理、社会适应及评定量表总分,以及LVA、RVA和BA的平均血流速度均较治疗前显著升高(P<0.05),且刃针组明显高于药物组(P<0.05)。
刃针治疗CD患者具有良好的临床效果,可能与其增加脑组织血液灌注的作用有关,值得临床应用。