Unal Erzurumlu Zerrin, Guler Cigdem, Uslu Cender Ebru, Cakıcı Elif B, Cankaya Soner
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Nov;82(11):1878-1883. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23355. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
The aim of this article is to compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. A total of 90 extracted molar teeth were used in this study. Amalgam was used to restore standard Class V preparations (5 × 3 × 2 mm). Following the restoration, the teeth were divided into three groups according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol (Group I: Control, Group II: 1.5 T MRI, and Group III: 3 T MRI). A total of 6,000 thermal cycles at 5°C-55°C were applied on all samples. Microleakage values were measured in millimeters using the ImageJ program. Microleakage values were higher in the gingival region compared to the occlusal region in all groups and the differences were statistically significant (p < .05). Microleakage values were not statistically different among the groups in the occlusal region (p > .05), while there were statistically significant differences among the groups with respect to microleakage values in the gingival region (p < .01). The highest mean microleakage amount in the gingival region was measured in Group III (1.192 ± 0.941 mm). This was followed by Group II (0.519 ± 0.813 mm) and Group I (0.347 ± 0.726 mm), respectively. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, we observed that higher microleakage values in amalgam restored teeth in which were exposed to MRI procedure. We also found that the teeth exposed to the stronger magnetic field showed higher microleakage amount.
本文旨在比较1.5T和3T磁共振成像(MRI)对汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。本研究共使用了90颗拔除的磨牙。采用汞合金修复标准Ⅴ类洞型(5×3×2mm)。修复后,根据磁共振成像(MRI)方案将牙齿分为三组(第一组:对照组,第二组:1.5T MRI组,第三组:3T MRI组)。对所有样本施加总共6000次5°C至55°C的热循环。使用ImageJ程序以毫米为单位测量微渗漏值。在所有组中,牙龈区域的微渗漏值均高于咬合区域,且差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。各组在咬合区域的微渗漏值无统计学差异(p>0.05),而在牙龈区域,各组间微渗漏值存在统计学差异(p<0.01)。第三组在牙龈区域测得的平均微渗漏量最高(1.192±0.941mm)。其次分别是第二组(0.519±0.813mm)和第一组(0.347±0.726mm)。在本体外研究的局限性内,我们观察到接受MRI检查的汞合金修复牙齿中微渗漏值更高。我们还发现,暴露于更强磁场的牙齿微渗漏量更高。