• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1.5T和3T磁共振成像对汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。

The effect of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations.

作者信息

Unal Erzurumlu Zerrin, Guler Cigdem, Uslu Cender Ebru, Cakıcı Elif B, Cankaya Soner

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Nov;82(11):1878-1883. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23355. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1002/jemt.23355
PMID:31368622
Abstract

The aim of this article is to compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. A total of 90 extracted molar teeth were used in this study. Amalgam was used to restore standard Class V preparations (5 × 3 × 2 mm). Following the restoration, the teeth were divided into three groups according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol (Group I: Control, Group II: 1.5 T MRI, and Group III: 3 T MRI). A total of 6,000 thermal cycles at 5°C-55°C were applied on all samples. Microleakage values were measured in millimeters using the ImageJ program. Microleakage values were higher in the gingival region compared to the occlusal region in all groups and the differences were statistically significant (p < .05). Microleakage values were not statistically different among the groups in the occlusal region (p > .05), while there were statistically significant differences among the groups with respect to microleakage values in the gingival region (p < .01). The highest mean microleakage amount in the gingival region was measured in Group III (1.192 ± 0.941 mm). This was followed by Group II (0.519 ± 0.813 mm) and Group I (0.347 ± 0.726 mm), respectively. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, we observed that higher microleakage values in amalgam restored teeth in which were exposed to MRI procedure. We also found that the teeth exposed to the stronger magnetic field showed higher microleakage amount.

摘要

本文旨在比较1.5T和3T磁共振成像(MRI)对汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。本研究共使用了90颗拔除的磨牙。采用汞合金修复标准Ⅴ类洞型(5×3×2mm)。修复后,根据磁共振成像(MRI)方案将牙齿分为三组(第一组:对照组,第二组:1.5T MRI组,第三组:3T MRI组)。对所有样本施加总共6000次5°C至55°C的热循环。使用ImageJ程序以毫米为单位测量微渗漏值。在所有组中,牙龈区域的微渗漏值均高于咬合区域,且差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。各组在咬合区域的微渗漏值无统计学差异(p>0.05),而在牙龈区域,各组间微渗漏值存在统计学差异(p<0.01)。第三组在牙龈区域测得的平均微渗漏量最高(1.192±0.941mm)。其次分别是第二组(0.519±0.813mm)和第一组(0.347±0.726mm)。在本体外研究的局限性内,我们观察到接受MRI检查的汞合金修复牙齿中微渗漏值更高。我们还发现,暴露于更强磁场的牙齿微渗漏量更高。

相似文献

1
The effect of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations.1.5T和3T磁共振成像对汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Nov;82(11):1878-1883. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23355. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations.3T MRI 对银汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130072. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130072. Epub 2013 May 14.
3
In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.Ⅰ类银汞合金和复合树脂修复体周围微渗漏的体内与体外评估。
Oper Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):641-8. doi: 10.2341/10-065-L.
4
Composite Replacement of Amalgam Restoration Versus Freshly Cut Dentin: An In Vitro Microleakage Comparison.汞合金修复体的复合替代与新鲜切割牙本质:一项体外微渗漏比较研究
Oper Dent. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):E73-82. doi: 10.2341/14-278-L. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
5
Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.汞合金粘结修复体的微渗漏:热循环的影响
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):316-23.
6
The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.牙本质黏结剂和垫底材料对乳恒牙Ⅱ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):223-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.h551um6313618465.
7
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.用汞合金和树脂复合材料修复体评估牙科粘结系统:微渗漏和粘结强度结果的比较
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9.
8
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.磁共振成像对银汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响:一项体外研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Oct;38(7):470-4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30077669.
9
[Influence of different bonding agents on marginal sealing quality of amalgam restorations].[不同粘结剂对银汞合金修复体边缘封闭质量的影响]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011 Nov-Dec;139(11-12):722-7. doi: 10.2298/sarh1112722j.
10
Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.在真空条件下使用不同粘合剂和染料的汞合金粘结修复体的微渗漏:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):252-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84298.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Different Physical Stressors' Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review.不同物理应激源如何影响银汞合金补牙材料中的汞释放及微渗漏?一项系统评价
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Jun 1;12(3):227-236. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175. eCollection 2022 Jun.