Institute of Psychology.
Department of Psychology.
Emotion. 2020 Dec;20(8):1423-1434. doi: 10.1037/emo0000645. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Research focusing on the association between age and emotion perception has revealed inconsistent findings, with some support for an age-related positivity effect, as predicted by socioemotional selectivity theory. We used the mood-of-the-crowd (MoC) task to investigate whether older adults judge a crowd consisting of happy and angry expressions to be dominated by happy faces more frequently. The task was to decide whether an array of faces included more angry or more happy faces. Accuracy, response times, and gaze movements were analyzed to test the hypothesis, derived from socioemotional selectivity theory, that age would be associated with a bias toward judging crowds as happy, and with longer and more numerous fixations on happy expressions. Seventy-six participants took part in the study representing 3 different age groups (young, middle-aged, old). Contrary to the hypothesis, older participants more often judged the emotional crowd to be angry compared with younger participants. Furthermore, whereas fixations were longer for happy faces than for angry faces in younger adults, this difference was not present in older adults. A decline in inhibitory processing in older adults as well as higher cognitive demands of the task are discussed as possible explanations for these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
研究集中于年龄和情绪感知之间的关系,揭示了不一致的发现,一些研究支持社会情绪选择理论所预测的与年龄相关的正性效应。我们使用群体情绪(MoC)任务来研究老年人是否更频繁地判断由快乐和愤怒表情组成的群体以快乐表情为主。任务是判断面部表情的排列中愤怒表情多还是快乐表情多。分析准确性、反应时间和注视运动,以检验源于社会情绪选择理论的假设,即年龄与判断群体为快乐的偏见以及对快乐表情的注视时间更长、次数更多有关。76 名参与者代表 3 个不同年龄组(年轻、中年、老年)参加了研究。与假设相反,与年轻参与者相比,年长参与者更常判断情绪群体为愤怒。此外,在年轻成年人中,快乐的面孔比愤怒的面孔注视时间更长,但在年长成年人中则没有这种差异。讨论了老年人抑制加工能力下降以及任务的更高认知需求,这些是造成这些发现的可能原因。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。