Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty Of Health Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Institute of Science, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jul;16(5):446-452. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1646822. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Pelvic asymmetry in the sagittal and horizontal planes among prosthesis users is related to the strength of the abdominal and back muscles. Considering that lumbosacral pathologies and pain in long-term transfemoral prosthesis users can cause asymmetric pelvic motion, it is necessary to investigate pelvic asymmetry caused by prosthetic components. The aim was to compare the gait symmetry of the pelvis of active transfemoral amputees using different types of prosthetic knee joints (Non-microprocessor-controlled prostheses (NMCPs) and microprocessor-controlled prostheses (MCP) knees).
The two patient groups comprised eight transfemoral amputees: four patients had NMCP joints (Turkish products), and four patients had MCP knees. The reference group consisted of ten normal volunteers. In this work, the 3-D motion of the pelvis, hip, knee and ankle was assessed using the VICON system.
The results revealed that during stance, the kinematics of pelvic movement in the amputee group differed from those of the control group in terms of the total excursion anterior pelvic tilt (APT) and maximum and minimum degrees of APT ( < .05). We evaluated the graphics of the NMCP and MCP knee joints and found that the prosthesis-side APT was closer to that of the control group during the stance phase among the NMCP users, while the APT of the MCP users was closer to that of the control group during the swing phase.
The investigated MCP benefitted the patients considerably. The NMCP did not provide as much walking as the MCP but produced less APT.Implications for RehabilitationThe MCP may not provide symmetrical pelvic motion during all phases of the gait cycle. In transfemoral amputees using MCP, focusing on pelvis in walking training will contribute to pre-prosthetic and post-prosthetics rehabilitation.The NMCP knee joint may be closer in terms of APT.
在矢状面和水平面,接受假体重建的患者中,骨盆的不对称与腹部和背部肌肉的力量有关。考虑到长期使用股假肢的腰骶部病变和疼痛可能导致骨盆运动的不对称,有必要研究由于假体部件引起的骨盆不对称。本研究的目的是比较使用不同类型的膝关节假体(非微处理器控制假体(NMCP)和微处理器控制假体(MCP)膝关节)的活动型股假肢患者的骨盆步态对称性。
两组患者共 8 名股截肢患者:4 名患者使用 NMCP 关节(土耳其产品),4 名患者使用 MCP 膝关节。参考组由 10 名正常志愿者组成。在这项工作中,使用 VICON 系统评估骨盆、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的三维运动。
结果显示,在站立期,截肢患者组的骨盆运动运动学与对照组相比,总前骨盆倾斜度(APT)和最大和最小 APT 度存在差异(<0.05)。我们评估了 NMCP 和 MCP 膝关节的图形,发现 NMCP 使用者在站立期,假体侧 APT 更接近对照组,而 MCP 使用者在摆动期 APT 更接近对照组。
所研究的 MCP 对患者有很大的帮助。NMCP 不能像 MCP 那样提供足够的行走,但 APT 较小。
MCP 可能不能在步态周期的所有阶段提供对称的骨盆运动。在使用 MCP 的股假肢患者中,在行走训练中关注骨盆,将有助于假体前和假体后的康复。NMCP 膝关节在 APT 方面可能更接近。