Clinical Studies, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Medicine 2, Naestved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Slagelse, Denmark.
Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;33(10):1255-1271. doi: 10.1177/0269216319866651. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
People living with life-threatening illness experience unmet existential needs despite the growing research and clinical field of palliative care. Narrative interventions show promise in managing these problems, but more knowledge is needed on the characteristics of narrative interventions and the feasibility of using personal narratives in a hospital.
To review the literature on personal narratives in hospital-based palliative care interventions and to strengthen palliative care practices.
We conducted a systematic integrative review with qualitative analysis and narrative synthesis in accordance with PRISMA where applicable (PROSPERO#:CRD42018089202).
We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cinahl, SocINDEX and PsychInfo for primary research articles published until June 2018. We assessed full-text articles against the eligibility criteria followed by a discussion of quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.
Of 480 articles, we found 24 eligible for this review: 8 qualitative, 14 quantitative and 2 mixed methods. The articles reported on dignity therapy, legacy building, outlook, short-term life review and life review. Data analysis resulted in five themes: core principles, theoretical framework, content of narrative, outcome and, finally, acceptability and feasibility.
Various types of systematic palliative care interventions use personal narratives. Common to these is a shared psychotherapeutic theoretical understanding and aim. Clinical application in a hospital setting is both feasible and acceptable but requires flexibility regarding the practices of the setting and the needs of the patient.
尽管姑息治疗的研究和临床领域不断发展,但患有危及生命疾病的人仍存在未得到满足的存在需求。叙事干预在解决这些问题方面显示出了希望,但我们需要更多关于叙事干预的特点以及在医院使用个人叙事的可行性的知识。
综述基于医院的姑息治疗干预中个人叙事的文献,并加强姑息治疗实践。
我们根据适用的 PRISMA 进行了系统的综合回顾,包括定性分析和叙事综合(PROSPERO#:CRD42018089202)。
我们在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cinahl、SocINDEX 和 PsychInfo 中进行了系统搜索,以查找截至 2018 年 6 月发表的原始研究文章。我们根据资格标准对全文文章进行评估,然后使用批判性评估技能计划讨论质量。
在 480 篇文章中,我们发现有 24 篇符合本综述的条件:8 篇定性、14 篇定量和 2 篇混合方法。这些文章报告了尊严治疗、遗产建设、展望、短期生命回顾和生命回顾。数据分析得出了五个主题:核心原则、理论框架、叙事内容、结果,最后是可接受性和可行性。
各种类型的系统姑息治疗干预都使用个人叙事。这些干预措施的共同点是具有共同的心理治疗理论理解和目标。在医院环境中的临床应用是可行且可接受的,但需要针对设置的实践和患者的需求具有灵活性。