Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Singapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, Singapore.
Cornea. 2020 Jan;39(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002090.
To describe a novel lamellar dissection technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation, and to evaluate the rate of endothelial cell loss (ECL) and graft preparation failure associated with this technique.
We conducted an ex vivo laboratory-based study comparing ECL between the lamellar dissection and peeling techniques. Eight pairs of human donor corneas underwent calcein acetoxymethyl staining-all right eyes underwent the peeling technique and all left eyes underwent the lamellar dissection technique. ECL was quantified by image analysis with trainable segmentation software and compared between groups. We also conducted a retrospective analysis of 161 consecutive DMEK graft preparations by a single surgeon using the lamellar dissection technique from 2010 to 2018. Data on donor characteristics and graft preparation failures were obtained.
Baseline donor characteristics were comparable in both arms of the laboratory-based study. Mean (SD) ECL with the lamellar dissection and peeling techniques was 13.8% (4.2%) and 11.2% (6.1%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two (P = 0.327). In the clinical series, there were 2 graft preparation failures in 161 cases (1.2%). Among cases performed on diabetic donor tissue, the rate of graft preparation failure was 4.7%.
The lamellar dissection technique has a similar rate of ECL compared with the peeling technique for DMEK graft preparation. This technique also has a low rate of graft preparation failure and may be a useful technique for diabetic donor tissue.
描述一种用于 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)供体准备的新型板层分离技术,并评估该技术相关的内皮细胞丢失(ECD)和供体准备失败的发生率。
我们进行了一项基于实验室的体外研究,比较了板层分离与剥离技术之间的 ECL 差异。8 对人供体角膜全部右眼接受剥离技术,全部左眼接受板层分离技术,进行钙黄绿素乙酰氧甲酯染色。使用可训练分割软件进行图像分析来量化 ECL,并在组间进行比较。我们还对 2010 年至 2018 年间由同一位外科医生使用板层分离技术进行的 161 例连续 DMEK 供体准备进行了回顾性分析。获取了供体特征和供体准备失败的数据。
实验室研究中两组供体的基线特征具有可比性。板层分离和剥离技术的平均(标准差)ECD 分别为 13.8%(4.2%)和 11.2%(6.1%)。两者之间没有显著差异(P=0.327)。在临床系列中,161 例中有 2 例(1.2%)供体准备失败。在糖尿病供体组织中,供体准备失败的发生率为 4.7%。
与 DMEK 供体准备的剥离技术相比,板层分离技术具有相似的 ECL 率。该技术的供体准备失败率也较低,可能是糖尿病供体组织的一种有用技术。