Department of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medtronic CRHF, Medtronic plc., Mounds View, Minnesota.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is routinely used to terminate ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs). However, little guidance exists on the most effective programming of ATP.
This study evaluated whether additional ATP sequences are more effective in reducing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.
In patients from the Shock-Less study, the number of overall shocks were compared between patients programmed to ≤3 ATP sequences (VT zone) and ≤1 ATP sequence (fast ventricular tachycardia [FVT] zone) (nominal group) and patients programmed to receive additional ATP sequences in VT (>3) or FVT (>1) zones.
Of the 4112 patients (15% receiving secondary prevention; 77% men; mean age 65.9 ± 12.6 years), 1532 patients (37%) were programmed with additional ATP sequences (1025 with >3 ATP sequences in the VT zone; 699 patients with >1 ATP sequence in the FVT zone). Over a mean follow-up period of 19.6 ± 10.7 months, 4359 VT/FVT episodes occurred in 591 patients. Compared with the nominal group, in patients with additional ATP programming, there was a 39% reduction in the number of shocked VT episodes (0.46 episodes per patient-year vs 0.28 episodes per patient-year; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.61; P < .001) and a 44% reduction in the number of shocked FVT episodes (0.83 episodes per patient-year vs 0.47 episodes per patient-year; IRR 0.56; P < .001). The reduction in shocked VT episodes was observed in both primary (IRR 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.90; P = .007) and secondary (IRR 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.72; P < .001) prevention patients.
Programming more than the nominal number of ATP sequences in both the VT and FVT zones is associated with a lower occurrence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in clinical practice.
抗心动过速起搏(ATP)通常用于终止室性心动过速(VTs)。然而,关于 ATP 最有效的编程方法几乎没有指导。
本研究评估了增加 ATP 序列是否能更有效地减少植入式心脏复律除颤器的电击次数。
在 Shock-Less 研究中的患者中,比较了程控至 ≤3 个 ATP 序列(VT 区)和 ≤1 个 ATP 序列(快速室性心动过速[FVT]区)(名义组)的患者与程控至 VT(>3)或 FVT(>1)区的患者接受更多 ATP 序列的总电击次数。
在 4112 例患者中(15%接受二级预防;77%为男性;平均年龄 65.9±12.6 岁),1532 例患者(37%)程控了附加 ATP 序列(1025 例患者 VT 区 ATP 序列>3 个;699 例患者 FVT 区 ATP 序列>1 个)。在平均 19.6±10.7 个月的随访期间,591 例患者发生了 4359 次 VT/FVT 发作。与名义组相比,在具有附加 ATP 编程的患者中,电击 VT 发作次数减少了 39%(0.46 次/患者年比 0.28 次/患者年;发生率比[IRR]0.61;P<.001),电击 FVT 发作次数减少了 44%(0.83 次/患者年比 0.47 次/患者年;IRR0.56;P<.001)。在原发性(IRR0.68;95%置信区间 0.51-0.90;P=.007)和继发性(IRR0.51;95%置信区间 0.35-0.72;P<.001)预防患者中均观察到电击 VT 发作次数减少。
在 VT 和 FVT 区程控超过名义数量的 ATP 序列与临床实践中植入式心脏复律除颤器电击次数减少相关。