School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.
Department of Science and Medicine, England and Wales Cricket Board, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK; National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.
Bone. 2019 Oct;127:537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Bone responds to mechanical loading by increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and/or bone area to enhance bone strength at the site of the greatest strain. Such localised adaptation has not been demonstrated at the spine. The aim of this study is to determine if BMD and/or bone mineral content (BMC) differs between dominant (ipsilateral to bowling/throwing arm) and non-dominant sides of the vertebrae in cricket fast bowlers, and whether this asymmetry differs according to stress fracture or disc injury history. A further aim was to determine if regional BMD and BMC in the lumbar spine differ between fast bowlers, other cricketers, rugby players and non-active controls, to highlight the site-specific response of lumbar vertebra to unilateral activity.
23 fast bowlers, 14 other cricketers, 22 rugby players and 20 controls underwent an antero-posterior (AP) and lateral DXA scans of their lumbar spine to assess BMD, BMC and area. A custom analysis measured BMD and BMC of the dominant and non-dominant sides (lateral 33%) of the AP lumbar spine. BMD and BMC were compared between groups, injury status, vertebrae and sides using ANOVA.
Analysis of medical records showed that 6 fast bowlers had a history of lumbar stress fracture. Significantly greater BMD and BMC was found in the L4 non-dominant vertebra compared with the dominant vertebra in fast bowlers. BMD and BMC differed significantly according to vertebra, side and group, with fast bowlers having significantly greater BMD and BMC at the L3 and L4 non-dominant vertebra compared with other groups (L3: 13.3%-45.3%, L4: 15.7%-44.0%) compared with other groups. Fast bowlers who never suffered lumbar stress fracture had 3.6% and 1.7% greater BMD in the dominant and non-dominant sides of lumbar vertebrae respectively compared with those who did suffer lumbar stress fracture, but evidence of this was weaker (P = 0.08).
The lumbar spine responds to a unique unilateral high loading activity through site-specific increased bone mass at the site of most strain. Fast bowlers had increased lumbar BMD, particularly on the non-dominant side of L4, although this adaptation was less marked in those with history of lumbar stress fracture. Site-specific low bone mineral density within the lumbar side may be implicated in the aetiology of lumbar stress fracture.
骨骼通过增加骨密度(BMD)和/或骨面积来对机械负荷作出反应,从而增强最大应变部位的骨骼强度。这种局部适应性尚未在脊柱中得到证明。本研究的目的是确定在板球快速投球手中,脊柱的优势侧(与投球/投掷手臂同侧)和非优势侧之间的 BMD 和/或骨矿物质含量(BMC)是否存在差异,以及这种不对称性是否因应力性骨折或椎间盘损伤史而有所不同。另一个目的是确定快速投球手、其他板球运动员、橄榄球运动员和非活跃对照组之间的腰椎区域 BMD 和 BMC 是否存在差异,以突出单侧活动对腰椎的特定部位反应。
23 名快速投球手、14 名其他板球运动员、22 名橄榄球运动员和 20 名对照组接受了腰椎前后位(AP)和侧位 DXA 扫描,以评估 BMD、BMC 和面积。定制分析测量了 AP 腰椎侧 33%的优势侧和非优势侧的 BMD 和 BMC。使用方差分析比较组间、损伤史、椎体和侧别之间的 BMD 和 BMC。
对病历的分析显示,6 名快速投球手有腰椎应力性骨折病史。快速投球手中,非优势侧 L4 椎体的 BMD 和 BMC 明显大于优势侧。BMD 和 BMC 根据椎体、侧别和组而有显著差异,与其他组相比,快速投球手中 L3 和 L4 非优势侧的 BMD 和 BMC 显著更高(L3:13.3%-45.3%,L4:15.7%-44.0%)。从未患过腰椎应力性骨折的快速投球手,其优势和非优势腰椎侧的 BMD 分别比患有腰椎应力性骨折的投球手高 3.6%和 1.7%,但证据较弱(P=0.08)。
腰椎通过在最大应变部位特异性增加骨量来对独特的单侧高负荷活动作出反应。快速投球手的腰椎 BMD 增加,特别是 L4 的非优势侧,但在有腰椎应力性骨折病史的患者中,这种适应性的程度较低。腰椎侧的特定部位低骨矿物质密度可能与腰椎应力性骨折的病因有关。