Callejas-Marcos I, Torrijos-Bravo A, Torres-Chica B, Ortiz-Gutiérrez R M
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, España.
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, España.
Rehabilitacion (Madr). 2019 Jul-Sep;53(3):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
To determine the efficacy of dry needling (DN) in the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrP) compared to other methods of physical therapy in the treatment of neck pain.
A systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE Complete (EBSCO), Pubmed, PEDro and Scopus databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the standard of biases of the Cochrane Collaboration.
Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria. The characteristics of the participants and the results of the comparison of the application of DN with ultrasound, TENS, manual therapy techniques (passive stretching, strain-counterstrain, ischaemic pressure) and kinesiotape bandage are described.
DN was a useful technique in reducing neck pain. However, its efficacy in the treatment of cervicalgia could not be determined in comparison with other physiotherapy approaches.
与其他物理治疗方法相比,确定干针疗法(DN)治疗颈部疼痛时对肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)的疗效。
在MEDLINE Complete(EBSCO)、Pubmed、PEDro和Scopus数据库中进行了系统检索。使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚标准评估研究质量。
11篇文章符合纳入标准。描述了参与者的特征以及DN与超声、经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、手法治疗技术(被动拉伸、应变-反应变、缺血性按压)和肌内效贴布比较应用的结果。
干针疗法是减轻颈部疼痛的一种有效技术。然而,与其他物理治疗方法相比,其治疗颈椎病的疗效尚不能确定。