Suppr超能文献

[与其他物理治疗技术相比,干针疗法治疗颈部疼痛的疗效:一项系统评价]

[Efficacy of dry needling in neck pain compared with other physiotherapy techniques: A systematic review].

作者信息

Callejas-Marcos I, Torrijos-Bravo A, Torres-Chica B, Ortiz-Gutiérrez R M

机构信息

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, España.

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Rehabilitacion (Madr). 2019 Jul-Sep;53(3):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of dry needling (DN) in the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrP) compared to other methods of physical therapy in the treatment of neck pain.

METHOD

A systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE Complete (EBSCO), Pubmed, PEDro and Scopus databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the standard of biases of the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria. The characteristics of the participants and the results of the comparison of the application of DN with ultrasound, TENS, manual therapy techniques (passive stretching, strain-counterstrain, ischaemic pressure) and kinesiotape bandage are described.

CONCLUSION

DN was a useful technique in reducing neck pain. However, its efficacy in the treatment of cervicalgia could not be determined in comparison with other physiotherapy approaches.

摘要

目的

与其他物理治疗方法相比,确定干针疗法(DN)治疗颈部疼痛时对肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)的疗效。

方法

在MEDLINE Complete(EBSCO)、Pubmed、PEDro和Scopus数据库中进行了系统检索。使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚标准评估研究质量。

结果

11篇文章符合纳入标准。描述了参与者的特征以及DN与超声、经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、手法治疗技术(被动拉伸、应变-反应变、缺血性按压)和肌内效贴布比较应用的结果。

结论

干针疗法是减轻颈部疼痛的一种有效技术。然而,与其他物理治疗方法相比,其治疗颈椎病的疗效尚不能确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验