• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在辅助生殖技术中的比较。

Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Dünya IVF Center, Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus Turkish Republic.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009
PMID:31371053
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) protocol is effective for preventing premature ovulation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S): Eighty-seven oocyte donors and 191 recipients of fresh oocytes.

INTERVENTION(S): Each donor was stimulated with a flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in one cycle and with the new fPPOS protocol in the other, within a period of 6 months. FSH was started on cycle day 2-3, and 0.25 mg/day GnRH antagonist or 10 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was started on stimulation day 7 or when the leading follicle reached 14 mm, whichever came first.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Duration of stimulation, gonadotropin consumption, duration of GnRH antagonist or MPA administration, number of metaphase II oocytes, and pregnancy rates in fresh oocyte recipients.

RESULTS

Duration of stimulation was 11 (10-11) days in both groups. Total gonadotropin consumption was similar. Pituitary suppression was started on day 7 and lasted for 5 days in each group. There were no premature ovulations in any group. The fPPOS yielded a significantly higher number of cumulus oocyte complexes than GnRH antagonist cycles (33 [21-39] vs. 26 [18-36], respectively). Likewise, the fPPOS generated significantly more metaphase II oocytes than GnRH antagonist cycles (24 [17-34] vs. 21 [15-28], respectively). Recipients of fresh oocytes from fPPOS and GnRH antagonist cycles had similar cleavage, blastulation, implantation, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (50% vs. 48.6%).

CONCLUSION(S): FPPOS with MPA seems to be an effective choice for preventing premature ovulation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation without compromising oocyte quality.

摘要

目的

确定灵活的孕激素预处理卵巢刺激(fPPOS)方案是否能有效预防早发性排卵。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

私立辅助生殖中心。

患者

87 名卵母细胞供体和 191 名新鲜卵母细胞受者。

干预

每位供体在 6 个月内的一个周期中接受灵活的促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案刺激,另一个周期中接受新的 fPPOS 方案刺激。FSH 于周期第 2-3 天开始,GnRH 拮抗剂或醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)于刺激第 7 天或主导卵泡达到 14mm 时开始,以先发生者为准,起始剂量分别为 0.25mg/天和 10mg/天。

主要观察指标

刺激持续时间、促性腺激素用量、GnRH 拮抗剂或 MPA 给药时间、MⅡ 卵母细胞数和新鲜卵母细胞受者的妊娠率。

结果

两组刺激持续时间均为 11(10-11)天。总促性腺激素用量相似。两组均于第 7 天开始垂体抑制,持续 5 天。两组均无早发性排卵。fPPOS 组获得的卵丘-卵母细胞复合物数量明显多于 GnRH 拮抗剂组(分别为 33[21-39]和 26[18-36])。同样,fPPOS 组产生的 MⅡ 卵母细胞数也明显多于 GnRH 拮抗剂组(分别为 24[17-34]和 21[15-28])。接受新鲜卵母细胞的受者,fPPOS 组和 GnRH 拮抗剂组的卵裂率、囊胚形成率、着床率和活产/持续妊娠率相似(分别为 50%和 48.6%)。

结论

在不影响卵母细胞质量的情况下,使用 MPA 的 fPPOS 似乎是预防卵巢刺激中早发性排卵的有效选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology.新型孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在辅助生殖技术中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
2
Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial.醋酸甲羟孕酮在卵母细胞捐赠中是一种替代促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的有用方法:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
3
Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study.控制性卵巢刺激排卵中卵泡发育不同步患者采用固定促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案与灵活孕激素预处理方案:一项回顾性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;12:690575. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690575. eCollection 2021.
4
Effectiveness of the flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol compared to the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with decreased ovarian reserve.在卵巢储备功能下降的妇女中,与灵活的 GnRH 拮抗剂方案相比,灵活的孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案的有效性。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Apr;25(2):306-312. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1794060. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
Outcomes of a GnRH Agonist Trigger Following a GnRH Antagonist or Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Cycle.GnRH 拮抗剂或灵活孕激素预处理卵巢刺激周期后 GnRH 激动剂触发的结局。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:837880. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.837880. eCollection 2022.
6
Exposure of antral follicles to medroxyprogesterone acetate during stimulation does not cause molecular perturbations in gonadotropin-responsiveness and steroidogenic function of granulosa cells in progestin-primed cycles.在促性腺激素刺激周期中,窦卵泡暴露于醋酸甲羟孕酮并不会导致颗粒细胞对促性腺激素的反应性和甾体生成功能的分子扰动。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Oct 1;39(10):2331-2340. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae189.
7
Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.口服微粒化孕酮预处理的卵巢刺激与GnRH拮抗剂方案后的卵巢反应和胚胎倍性。一项重复卵巢刺激周期的前瞻性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae047.
8
[Medroxyprogesteron acetate use to block LH surge in oocyte donor stimulation].[使用醋酸甲羟孕酮阻断卵母细胞供体刺激中的促黄体生成素高峰]
Ceska Gynekol. 2018 Winter;83(1):11-16.
9
Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial.醋酸甲羟孕酮与加尼瑞克用于卵母细胞捐赠:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
10
New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles.地屈孕酮在 IVF 促性腺激素预备周期中的新应用:一项纳入 516 个首次 IVF/ICSI 周期的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在辅助生殖技术中的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03612-4.
2
Euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol.使用孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案与GnRH拮抗剂方案进行非整倍体周期植入前基因检测时的整倍体率和妊娠结局
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 May 17;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01398-9.
3
Comparison of the euploidy rate in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles following progestin-primed versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled study.
孕激素预处理方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案用于非整倍体周期植入前基因检测时的整倍体率比较:一项随机对照研究
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 May 13;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01404-0.
4
Comparison of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes in Two Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Using Follitropin Delta, a Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH) Injection.使用重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)注射用的卵泡刺激素δ,比较两种控制性卵巢刺激方案中的辅助生殖技术(ART)结局。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81281. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Comparison of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone use in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a single center retrospective analysis.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案长方案在体外受精-胚胎移植中的应用
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2657-2662. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07756-z. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
6
Comparison of fixed and flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women classified in patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualized oocyte number (POSEIDON) group 4.按包含个体化卵子数的患者导向策略分组的女性中,固定方案与灵活方案促性腺激素预处理卵巢刺激的比较(POSEIDON 研究 4 组)。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):2203-2209. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07690-0. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
7
Comparison of progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in terms of preventing premature LH surge and assisted reproductive technology outcome in infertile women: a randomized controlled trial.在预防不孕女性过早出现促黄体生成素峰及辅助生殖技术结局方面,孕激素方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案的比较:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):1999-2008. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07387-4. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
The comparison between fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate combined with letrozole in patients of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a propensity score-matched study.孕激素预处理促排卵方案中醋酸甲羟孕酮固定剂量与递减剂量联合来曲唑的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 12;14:1295787. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1295787. eCollection 2023.
9
Switching from cetrorelix to dydrogesterone in an IVF cycle - a new strategy for unexpected freeze-all cycles.在体外受精周期中从西曲瑞克转换为地屈孕酮——意外全胚冷冻周期的新策略。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Oct 18;27(4):754-7. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230036.
10
Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates between Flexible and Conventional Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Ovarian Response Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study.根据POSEIDON标准比较灵活型与传统孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案在卵巢反应不良患者中的累积活产率:一项队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;12(18):5775. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185775.