Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Oct;28(10):104290. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
The current American Heart Association guidelines for the management of acute ischemic stroke advise against the use of intravenous (IV) alteplase in patients with recurrent stroke occurring within 90 days of their index event. Following these guidelines strictly, patients having early recurrent ischemic stroke would be unable to avail of this reperfusion strategy that has been proven to confer superior clinical outcomes. While some registry-based studies have demonstrated the safety of IV alteplase in this subgroup of patients, data on the repeated use of the drug are lacking. Thus, we aim to determine the safety and efficacy of repeated thrombolysis in patients with early recurrent ischemic strokes.
The following electronic databases were searched for relevant studies: the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials by The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE by PubMed, Health Research and Development Information Network, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 90-day clinical outcomes, systemic hemorrhage and allergic reactionswere synthesized.
Ten articles with 33 patients in total were included in our review. One patient developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after the second reperfusion attempt and subsequently died from pneumonia. Another died from spontaneous rupture of previously unidentified infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Six of the 13 patients with available follow-up data had good clinical outcomes (Modified Rankin Score 0-2). There were no allergic reactions and other drug-related adverse events noted.
Repeated IV alteplase can be safe and efficacious in patients who have early recurrent ischemic stroke. Larger studies, trials, or registry-based data are needed to ascertain the encouraging findings of our review.
目前,美国心脏协会(AHA)关于急性缺血性脑卒中管理的指南建议,对于首发事件后 90 天内发生复发性脑卒中的患者,避免使用静脉内(IV)阿替普酶。严格遵循这些指南,早期复发性缺血性脑卒中患者将无法使用已被证明可带来更好临床结局的再灌注策略。尽管一些基于登记的研究已经证明了该亚组患者使用 IV 阿替普酶的安全性,但缺乏关于该药物重复使用的数据。因此,我们旨在确定在早期复发性缺血性脑卒中患者中重复溶栓的安全性和疗效。
检索了以下电子数据库中的相关研究:Cochrane 图书馆的 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed 的 MEDLINE、健康研究与发展信息网络(Health Research and Development Information Network)、Scopus 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。对症状性颅内出血、90 天临床结局、全身性出血和过敏反应的数据进行了综合分析。
共纳入了 10 篇文章,总计 33 例患者。1 例患者在第二次再灌注尝试后出现症状性颅内出血,随后因肺炎死亡。另 1 例患者死于先前未发现的肾下主动脉瘤自发性破裂。13 例可获得随访数据的患者中,有 6 例具有良好的临床结局(改良 Rankin 评分 0-2)。未发生过敏反应和其他与药物相关的不良事件。
在早期复发性缺血性脑卒中患者中,重复使用 IV 阿替普酶可能是安全且有效的。需要更大规模的研究、试验或基于登记的研究来确定我们的综述中令人鼓舞的发现。