Temporary ventricular assist device implantation by sternotomy-avoiding technique for bridge-to-decision therapy: a comparison with conventional implantation.

OBJECTIVE

Temporary ventricular assist device (VAD) is a commonly used therapeutic option for cardiogenic shock. Patients requiring this treatment are often critical, and clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a sternotomy-avoiding technique for temporary VAD implantation to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

Between December 2012 and November 2018, seven patients underwent temporary VAD implantation by sternotomy-avoiding technique (SA group) and eight by median sternotomy technique (MS group). Pre- and intraoperative characteristics, postoperative 7-day hemodynamic parameters, 30-day mortality, and adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

More than 50% of the patients were mechanically supported before temporary VAD implantation. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the SA than in the MS group (84 min vs 215 min; p = 0.011); surgical time tended to be shorter in the SA group (385 min vs 461 min; p = 0.064). Pump index, cardiac index, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and central venous pressure did not differ significantly during the first seven days of support. The 30-day incidence of any adverse event was not significantly different between the groups. No patients in the SA group needed re-exploration for surgical bleeding. Thirty-day all-cause mortality rates were 29% in the SA group and 0% in the MS group (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The sternotomy-avoiding and conventional techniques resulted in comparable short-term hemodynamic support. The sternotomy-avoiding technique was associated with a potential reduction in risk of re-exploration for bleeding. These results support the usefulness of the sternotomy-avoiding procedure for selected patients.