Department of Psychology, The Center for Eating Disorders at Sheppard Pratt, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 Sep;52(9):1004-1014. doi: 10.1002/eat.23143. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was to evaluate the effect of brief, cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) for anorexia nervosa (AN) on set-shifting.
Two hundred seventy-five inpatient adults and adolescents with AN (mean age = 23.1; SD = 12.7) were randomly assigned (using simple randomization procedures) to either a CRT or control condition. All participants received treatment as usual; however, the CRT condition completed five CRT group sessions in lieu of other group therapies provided on the unit. Set-shifting abilities were evaluated by: (a) neuropsychological measures and (b) experimental cognitive behavior therapy thought records. Blinding of group assignment occurred during baseline assessment and ended following group commencement.
Data from 135 CRT and 140 control condition participants were analyzed. On all neuropsychological measures, results revealed no between group condition effects, but did show statistically significant time effects, with medium to large effect sizes. Thought record analysis revealed a significant condition by age interaction effect where adults in the CRT condition generated significantly more alternative thoughts and had stronger believability of alternative thoughts than children, a trend that was not found in the control condition. This yielded moderate to large effect sizes of.0.56 and 0.72, respectively.
Based on traditional neuropsychological measures, these findings do not suggest a differential effect of CRT for AN in the format applied. However, results suggest that CRT may have some increased beneficial cognitive effect for adults, as compared to children, based on thought record analysis.
本平行设计随机对照试验旨在评估简短认知矫正疗法(CRT)对神经性厌食症(AN)的转换能力的影响。
275 名住院成年和青少年 AN 患者(平均年龄=23.1;SD=12.7)被随机分配至 CRT 或对照组(使用简单随机化程序)。所有参与者均接受常规治疗;然而,CRT 组完成了 5 次 CRT 小组治疗,以替代单位提供的其他小组治疗。通过:(a)神经心理学测量和(b)实验认知行为治疗思维记录来评估转换能力。在基线评估期间进行组分配的盲法,在小组开始后结束。
对 135 名 CRT 和 140 名对照组参与者的数据进行了分析。在所有神经心理学测量中,结果均未显示出组间条件效应,但确实显示出具有统计学意义的时间效应,具有中等至大的效应量。思维记录分析显示出条件与年龄的交互效应,即 CRT 组的成年人比儿童产生了更多的替代思维,对替代思维的可信度更高,而在对照组中则没有这种趋势。这产生了中等至大的效应量,分别为 0.56 和 0.72。
根据传统的神经心理学测量,这些发现并不表明 CRT 在应用形式上对 AN 有不同的效果。然而,结果表明,基于思维记录分析,与儿童相比,CRT 可能对成人有一些增加的有益认知效果。