Suppr超能文献

未知与假设的泛滥:苏里南皮肤利什曼病的局部解释。

Not-knowing and the proliferation of assumptions: local explanations of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Suriname.

机构信息

Amsterdam Medical Centre, Dermatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anthropol Med. 2020 Jun;27(2):144-159. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2019.1627654. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

Abstract

Why do patients and others confronted with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) - a parasitic skin disease - in the hinterland of Suriname, South America, provide a dazzling variety of aetiological explanations for one single illness? And how do these explanations reflect local knowledge of and interest in the origin of illness? In this article, we explore these questions using the concept of 'not-knowing', as introduced by Murray Last in 1981. One of Last's conclusions is that 'don't knows' or 'don't cares' reflect people's disinterest in medicine. The aim of this article, however, is to draw attention to another aspect of not-knowing: it may lead to a proliferation of explanatory assumptions, unhindered by precise knowledge. In other words, multiple explanations mask not-knowing, which is from a methodological point of view a rarely observed element in social science research and constitutes an important addition to Murray Last's well known argument. The paper describes findings based on anthropological fieldwork carried out between September 2009 and December 2010 at the Dermatology Service in Suriname's capital Paramaribo and among 205 CL patients and 321 inhabitants in various communities in the hinterland. As this article shows, both knowing and not-knowing are rooted in the various contexts of people's daily lives and reflect their historical, socio-cultural, occupational, educational, biological, environmental, and public health-related conditions. Public health authorities should explore not-knowing more seriously in their efforts to prevent illness, since knowing about not-knowing is valuable in the design of health education and prevention programmes.

摘要

为什么在南美洲苏里南内陆地区,患有皮肤利什曼病(CL)的患者和其他人会对一种单一疾病提供各种各样的病因解释?这些解释如何反映出当地对疾病起源的了解和兴趣?在本文中,我们使用 Murray Last 于 1981 年提出的“不知道”概念来探讨这些问题。Last 的结论之一是,“不知道”或“不在乎”反映了人们对医学的不感兴趣。然而,本文的目的是要引起人们对“不知道”的另一个方面的关注:它可能会导致解释性假设的大量增加,而不受精确知识的限制。换句话说,多种解释掩盖了“不知道”,从方法论的角度来看,这是社会科学研究中很少观察到的一个元素,是对 Murray Last 著名论点的重要补充。本文描述了基于 2009 年 9 月至 2010 年 12 月在苏里南首都帕拉马里博的皮肤科服务中心以及在内陆地区的 205 例 CL 患者和 321 名居民中进行的人类学实地调查的发现。正如本文所示,无论是“知道”还是“不知道”都根植于人们日常生活的各种背景之中,反映了他们的历史、社会文化、职业、教育、生物、环境和公共卫生相关条件。公共卫生当局应该更认真地探讨“不知道”,因为了解“不知道”对于设计健康教育和预防方案是有价值的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验