• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双胎妊娠生物测量及超声估测胎儿体重的新参考值与既往标准曲线比较

New reference values for biometrical measurements and sonographic estimated fetal weight in twin gestations and comparison to previous normograms.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera 38100, Israel.

The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2019 Sep 25;47(7):757-764. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0207.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2019-0207
PMID:31373899
Abstract

Objective To construct new reference values for biometrical measurements and sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) in twin gestations and compare them to previously published normograms. Methods A retrospective analysis of sEFW evaluations of twin gestations was performed between 2011 and 2016 in a single university-affiliated medical center. sEFW was calculated using the Hadlock 1985 formula. To avoid selection bias, one evaluation per pregnancy was randomly selected. Following mathematical transformation to obtain normality of values, normograms were constructed using a best-fit regression model for estimation of mean and standard deviation at each gestational age (GA). Normograms were validated by applying all observations to ensure equal distribution at parallel percentiles. Our normograms were then compared to previously published sEFW normograms for twin gestations. Results A total of 864 sEFW evaluations were performed on 195 twin pregnancies at 22-39 gestational weeks. Of them, 390 entered the primary analysis. The rest were left for validation. Seventy percent of the cohort were dichorionic-diamniotic twins (136/195), 16% (32/195) were monochorionic-diamniotic twins and three (1.5%) were monochorionic-monoamniotic twins. Twenty-four fetuses lacked data on chorionicity. The rest were monochorionic twins or were of unknown chorionicity. Values corresponding to the 2.5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97.5th percentiles for sEFW are presented for every GA. Validation by applying all 864 evaluations on constructed normograms was achieved. Comparison to previously published twins' sEFW normograms demonstrated wide variation between curves. Conclusion New reference values for biometrical measurements and sEFW in twin gestations are presented for clinical and research use. Comparison to other curves demonstrates the wide variability and need for further investigation on twin's normal growth.

摘要

目的

构建新的双胎妊娠生物测量值和超声估测胎儿体重(sEFW)参考值,并与已发表的标准曲线进行比较。方法:对 2011 年至 2016 年期间在一家大学附属医院进行的双胎妊娠 sEFW 评估进行回顾性分析。使用 Hadlock 1985 公式计算 sEFW。为避免选择偏倚,每个妊娠随机选择一次评估。在对数值进行数学转换以获得正态性后,使用最佳拟合回归模型构建每个胎龄(GA)的均值和标准差估计值的标准曲线。通过将所有观察值应用于标准曲线验证来确保平行百分位数的均等分布。然后,将我们的标准曲线与已发表的双胎妊娠 sEFW 标准曲线进行比较。结果:在 22-39 孕周对 195 例双胎妊娠进行了 864 次 sEFW 评估。其中,390 次进入主要分析。其余的用于验证。队列的 70%为双绒毛膜-双羊膜双胎(136/195),16%(32/195)为单绒毛膜-双羊膜双胎,3 例(1.5%)为单绒毛膜-单羊膜双胎。24 例胎儿缺少关于绒毛膜性的数据。其余的为单绒毛膜双胎或绒毛膜性未知。每个 GA 均呈现 sEFW 第 2.5、10、50、90 和 97.5 百分位的相应值。通过将所有 864 次评估应用于构建的标准曲线,实现了验证。与已发表的双胎 sEFW 标准曲线比较显示,曲线之间存在广泛差异。结论:为临床和研究用途提供了新的双胎妊娠生物测量值和 sEFW 参考值。与其他曲线的比较表明,双胎正常生长存在广泛的变异性,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
New reference values for biometrical measurements and sonographic estimated fetal weight in twin gestations and comparison to previous normograms.双胎妊娠生物测量及超声估测胎儿体重的新参考值与既往标准曲线比较
J Perinat Med. 2019 Sep 25;47(7):757-764. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0207.
2
Reference Values for Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight in Twin Gestations Stratified by Chorionicity: A Single Center Study.按绒毛膜性分层的双胎妊娠超声估计胎儿体重的参考值:一项单中心研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Apr;36(4):793-798. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.02049. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
3
Abdominal circumference discordance for prediction of small for gestational age at birth in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠胎儿生长受限的预测:腹围差异。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Sep;35(18):3573-3578. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1832071. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
Standards of birth weight in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity.根据胎盘绒毛膜性分层的双胎妊娠出生体重标准。
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):917-24. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00052-0.
5
Twin pregnancies in the second trimester in women in an alpha-fetoprotein screening program: sonographic evaluation and outcome.参与甲胎蛋白筛查项目的女性孕中期双胎妊娠:超声评估与结局
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Nov;161(5):1007-13. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.5.7506005.
6
An ultrasound-based fetal weight reference for twins.基于超声的双胎胎儿体重参考标准。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):224.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
7
Twin chorionicity-specific population birth-weight charts adjusted for estimated fetal weight.按估计胎儿体重校正的双绒毛膜性特有群体出生体重图表。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;58(3):439-449. doi: 10.1002/uog.23606.
8
Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.双绒毛膜双胎的生长轨迹:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):221.e1-221.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.044. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
9
Placental weight, birth weight and fetal:placental weight ratio in dichorionic and monochorionic twin gestations in function of gestational age, cord insertion type and placental partition.双绒毛膜和单绒毛膜双胎妊娠中胎盘重量、出生体重及胎儿与胎盘重量比与孕周、脐带插入类型和胎盘分隔的关系
Placenta. 2015 Feb;36(2):213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
10
A cohort study of fetal growth in twin pregnancies by chorionicity: comparison with European and American standards.一项通过胎盘类型对双胞胎妊娠胎儿生长进行的队列研究:与欧洲和美国标准的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.044. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Fetal Growth in Twin Pregnancies and the Choice of Growth Chart.双胎妊娠中的胎儿生长及生长曲线的选择
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Aug 9;4(4):234-237. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000131. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Fetal biometry reference ranges derived from prospective twin population and evaluation of adverse perinatal outcome.源自前瞻性双胎人群的胎儿生物测量参考范围及围产期不良结局评估。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;65(4):436-446. doi: 10.1002/uog.29190. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation charts for fetal growth in twins: nationwide Danish cohort study.
丹麦全国队列研究:胎儿医学基金会双胞胎胎儿生长图表的验证
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):730-738. doi: 10.1002/uog.29125. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
4
The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy-Comparison of the First and Second Twins.超声估计胎儿体重的准确性及双胎妊娠小于胎龄儿的预测——第一胎儿与第二胎儿的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 May 6;12(9):3307. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093307.