Effectiveness of distally slotted proximal femoral nails on prevention of femur fractures during and after intertrochanteric femur fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Intra- and post-operative femoral shaft fractures related with nailing remain of concern. Although manufacturers have sought to solve the problem by providing distally slotted nails, it is not clear that these implants reduce fractures. We compare two distally slotted proximal femoral nails [trochanteric nail (TRON) and proximal femur intramedullary nail (PROFIN)].

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 195 hips treated with TRONs (distally slotted in four places in the sagittal and coronal planes) and 583 hips treated with PROFINs (distally slotted in two places in the coronal plane) in two institutes were retrospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria were follow-up for at least 6 months; pertrochanteric fractures and age over 55 years.

RESULTS

In total, 161 hips in the TRON group and 512 hips in the PROFIN group were included. The mean follow-up time was 28.5 (range: 6-84) months in whole group. The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Only 2 intraoperative shaft and 3 proximal lateral cortex fracture was detected in PROFIN group, there wasn't any postoperative fracture. Four proximal lateral cortex and 2 femur shaft fractures were detected in TRON group (one during operation and one at postoperative 8th month after a fall at pedestrian way).

CONCLUSIONS

Distal cephalomedullary nail slotting prevented intra- and post-operative femoral fractures. A distal slot 50 mm in length may increase nail elasticity and reduce nail tip stress to a greater extent than a 30-mm slot. Distal slotting in both the sagittal and coronal planes afforded no advantage compared to coronal slotting only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective study.