Suppr超能文献

监护仪位置对新生儿复苏期间视觉注意和态势感知的影响:一项随机模拟研究。

Effect of monitor positioning on visual attention and situation awareness during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised simulation study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 May;105(3):285-291. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316992. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare situation awareness (SA), visual attention (VA) and protocol adherence in simulated neonatal resuscitations using two different monitor positions.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled simulation study.

SETTINGS

Simulation lab at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare providers (HCPs) with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification within the last 2 years and trained in neonatal endotracheal intubations.

INTERVENTION

HCPs were randomised to either central (eye-level on the radiant warmer) or peripheral (above eye-level, wall-mounted) monitor positions. Each led a complex resuscitation with a high-fidelity mannequin and a standardised assistant. To measure SA, situation awareness global assessment tool (SAGAT) was used, where simulations were paused at three predetermined points, with five questions asked each pause. Videos were analysed for SAGAT and adherence to a NRP checklist. Eye-tracking glasses recorded participants' VA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome was SA as measured by composite SAGAT score. Secondary outcomes included VA and adherence to NRP checklist.

RESULTS

Thirty simulations were performed; 29 were completed per protocol and analysed. Twenty-two eye-tracking recordings were of sufficient quality and analysed. Median composite SAGAT was 11.5/15 central versus 11/15 peripheral, p=0.56. Checklist scores 46/50 central versus 46/50 peripheral, p=0.75. Most VA was directed at the mannequin (30.6% central vs 34.1% peripheral, p=0.76), and the monitor (28.7% central vs 20.5% peripheral, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation, SAGAT and eye-tracking can be used to evaluate human factors of neonatal resuscitation. During simulated neonatal resuscitation, monitor position did not affect SA, VA or protocol adherence.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同监护仪位置在模拟新生儿复苏中情况下意识(SA)、视觉注意(VA)和方案依从性。

设计

随机对照模拟研究。

设置

加拿大埃德蒙顿皇家亚历山德拉医院的模拟实验室。

参与者

具有新生儿复苏计划(NRP)认证且在过去 2 年内接受过新生儿气管内插管培训的医疗保健提供者(HCPs)。

干预措施

HCPs 被随机分配到中央(辐射保暖器的眼睛水平)或外周(高于眼睛水平,壁挂式)监护仪位置。每个 HCP 都使用高保真模型和标准化助手领导一次复杂的复苏。为了测量 SA,使用了情况意识综合评估工具(SAGAT),在三个预定的点暂停模拟,每个暂停点问五个问题。对视频进行 SAGAT 和 NRP 检查表依从性分析。眼动追踪眼镜记录参与者的 VA。

主要观察结果

主要结果是通过复合 SAGAT 评分测量的 SA。次要结果包括 VA 和 NRP 检查表依从性。

结果

共进行了 30 次模拟;29 次按照方案完成并进行了分析。22 次眼动追踪记录的质量足够并进行了分析。中央监护仪位置的中位数综合 SAGAT 为 11.5/15,外周监护仪位置为 11/15,p=0.56。中央监护仪位置检查表评分为 46/50,外周监护仪位置为 46/50,p=0.75。大部分 VA 都集中在模型上(中央监护仪位置为 30.6%,外周监护仪位置为 34.1%,p=0.76),其次是监护仪(中央监护仪位置为 28.7%,外周监护仪位置为 20.5%,p=0.06)。

结论

模拟、SAGAT 和眼动追踪可用于评估新生儿复苏的人为因素。在模拟新生儿复苏中,监护仪位置不影响 SA、VA 或方案依从性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验