Choi Kwang Jin, Tak Hyo Jung, Dwyer Richard, Mousa Peter, Barreras Nicholas, Dawahir Wafa, Christou Theodore, Yoon John D
From the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, the Department of Health Services Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and Mercy Hospital & Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
South Med J. 2019 Aug;112(8):457-461. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001003.
This study assesses physicians' attitudes on the importance of working with colleagues who share the same ethical or moral outlook regarding morally controversial healthcare practices and examines the association of physicians' religious and spiritual characteristics with these attitudes.
We conducted a secondary data analysis of a 2009 national survey that was administered to a stratified random sample of 1504 US primary care physicians (PCPs). In that dataset, physicians were asked: "For you personally, how important is it to work with colleagues who share your ethical/moral outlook regarding morally controversial health care practices?" We examined associations between physicians' religious/spiritual characteristics and their attitudes toward having a shared ethical/moral outlook with colleagues.
Among eligible respondents, the response rate was 63% (896/1427). Overall, 69% of PCPs indicated that working with colleagues who share their ethical/moral outlook regarding morally controversial healthcare practices was either very important (23%) or somewhat important (46%). Physicians who were more religious were more likely than nonreligious physicians to report that a shared ethical/moral outlook was somewhat/very important to them ( < 0.001 for all measures of religiosity, including religious affiliation, attendance at religious services, intrinsic religiosity, and importance of religion as well as spirituality). Physicians with a high sense of calling were more likely than those with a low sense of calling to report a high importance of having a shared ethical/moral outlook with colleagues regarding morally controversial healthcare practices (multivariate odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.1).
In this national study of PCPs, physicians who identified as religious, spiritual, or having a high sense of calling were found to place a stronger emphasis on the importance of shared ethical/moral outlook with work colleagues regarding morally controversial healthcare practices. Moral controversy in health care may pose a particular challenge for physicians with lower commitments to theological pluralism.
本研究评估医生对于与在道德上有争议的医疗行为持有相同伦理或道德观念的同事合作的重要性的态度,并考察医生的宗教和精神特征与这些态度之间的关联。
我们对2009年一项全国性调查进行了二次数据分析,该调查针对1504名美国初级保健医生(PCP)的分层随机样本开展。在该数据集中,医生们被问及:“就您个人而言,与在道德上有争议的医疗行为方面与您持有相同伦理/道德观念的同事合作有多重要?”我们考察了医生的宗教/精神特征与其对与同事拥有共同伦理/道德观念的态度之间的关联。
在符合条件的受访者中,回复率为63%(896/1427)。总体而言,69%的初级保健医生表示,与在道德上有争议的医疗行为方面与他们持有相同伦理/道德观念的同事合作要么非常重要(23%)要么有些重要(46%)。与非宗教医生相比,宗教信仰更强的医生更有可能报告说共同的伦理/道德观念对他们有些/非常重要(所有宗教信仰衡量指标,包括宗教归属、参加宗教仪式、内在宗教信仰以及宗教和精神性的重要性,p均<0.001)。使命感强的医生比使命感弱的医生更有可能报告说在道德上有争议的医疗行为方面与同事拥有共同的伦理/道德观念非常重要(多变量优势比2.5,95%置信区间1.5 - 4.1)。
在这项针对初级保健医生的全国性研究中,发现那些认定为有宗教信仰、有精神信仰或使命感强的医生更加强调在道德上有争议的医疗行为方面与工作同事拥有共同伦理/道德观念的重要性。医疗保健中的道德争议可能对神学多元主义信念较低的医生构成特殊挑战。