Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3051-3056. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07049-6. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
The timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has been debated with most studies favoring early cholecystectomy (< 72 h of onset). However, most reported studies are from single institution studies with only a few population-based studies. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy within 72 h of emergency department (ED) presentation to patients undergoing cholecystectomy following 72 h in a large statewide database.
The New York SPARCS administrative database was used to identify all adult patients presenting to the ED with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis from 2005 to 2016. Patients aged < 18, missing data, or other biliary diagnoses were excluded from the analysis. Early cholecystectomy was defined as within 72 h of presentation to the emergency department. Early vs late groups were compared in terms of overall complications, bile duct injury (BDI), hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-days ED visits and readmissions. The linear trends of yearly early/late cholecystectomies were examined using a log-linear Poisson regression models. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to compare complications, BDI, and 30-day readmission/ED visits after controlling for confounding factors. Multivariable generalized linear regression for a negative binomial distributed count data was used to compare LOS.
Following the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, there were 109,862 patients who presented to an ED with the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The majority of patients underwent early cholecystectomy (n = 93,761, 85.3%), whereas only 16,101 patients underwent late cholecystectomy (14.7%). There was an increasing trend of early cholecystectomy from 2005 (81.1%) to 2016 (87.8%). On multivariable regression, patients with early cholecystectomy were less likely to have complications (OR 0.542, 95% CI 0.518-0.566), had shorter LOS (ratio 0.461, 95% CI 0.458-0.465), were less likely to have 30-day readmission (OR 0.871, 95% CI 0.816-0.928), 30-day ED visits (OR 0.909, 95% CI 0.862-0.959), and bile duct injury (OR 0.654, 95% CI 0.444-0.962) compared to late cholecystectomy patients.
Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with fewer complications, specifically BDI, shorter LOS, and fewer 30-day readmissions and ED visits. For patients presenting to the ED for acute cholecystitis, early cholecystectomy should be preferred.
急性胆囊炎的胆囊切除术时机一直存在争议,大多数研究都赞成早期胆囊切除术(发病后<72 小时)。然而,大多数报告的研究都是来自单一机构的研究,只有少数是基于人群的研究。本研究的目的是比较在急诊就诊后 72 小时内接受胆囊切除术的患者与在急诊就诊后 72 小时后接受胆囊切除术的患者的临床结局,使用的是一个大型全州数据库。
利用纽约州 SPARCS 行政数据库,确定了 2005 年至 2016 年间所有因急性胆囊炎到急诊科就诊的成年患者。排除年龄<18 岁、数据缺失或其他胆道诊断的患者。早期胆囊切除术定义为在急诊科就诊后 72 小时内。比较早期和晚期两组的总体并发症、胆管损伤(BDI)、住院时间(LOS)、30 天内急诊科就诊和再入院。使用对数线性泊松回归模型检查每年早期/晚期胆囊切除术的线性趋势。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,在控制混杂因素后,比较并发症、BDI 和 30 天内再入院/急诊科就诊。使用负二项式分布计数数据的多变量广义线性回归来比较 LOS。
在应用纳入/排除标准后,共有 109862 名患者因急性胆囊炎到急诊科就诊。大多数患者接受了早期胆囊切除术(n=93761,85.3%),只有 16101 名患者接受了晚期胆囊切除术(14.7%)。从 2005 年(81.1%)到 2016 年(87.8%),早期胆囊切除术的趋势呈上升趋势。在多变量回归中,早期胆囊切除术的患者发生并发症的可能性较低(OR 0.542,95%CI 0.518-0.566),住院时间较短(比值 0.461,95%CI 0.458-0.465),30 天内再入院的可能性较低(OR 0.871,95%CI 0.816-0.928),30 天内急诊科就诊的可能性较低(OR 0.909,95%CI 0.862-0.959),胆管损伤的可能性较低(OR 0.654,95%CI 0.444-0.962)。
早期胆囊切除术(<72 小时)与较少的并发症(特别是 BDI)、较短的 LOS 和较少的 30 天内再入院和急诊科就诊有关。对于因急性胆囊炎到急诊科就诊的患者,应首选早期胆囊切除术。