Cid Ruzafa Javier, Ulrichsen Sinna Pilgaard, Bennett Dimitri, Ehrenstein Vera
Real World Evidence, Evidera, The Ark, 201 Talgarth Rd, London, W6 8BJ, UK.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Sep;6(3):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-0160-6.
A Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) sent in Denmark on 11 August 2011 provided information on new pioglitazone labelling and guidance on monitoring treatment effectiveness. We describe pioglitazone use in Denmark after the DHPC, estimate the incidence of heart failure (HF), quantify pioglitazone cessation following a diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) or uninvestigated macroscopic haematuria, and describe glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values.
This was a cohort study. From Danish population-based registries, cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus incident or prevalent users of pioglitazone or insulin in 2011-2015 were created. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, laboratory results (available for a regional subset of the population), and incidence rates of HF and BC were estimated.
There were 80 pioglitazone and 17,699 insulin incident users, 140 pioglitazone and 13,183 insulin prevalent users. There were no new BC cases among incident pioglitazone users, and < 5 new BC cases among prevalent pioglitazone users. Pioglitazone was rarely the first-line treatment. History of haematuria was documented in < 5 incident and 11 prevalent pioglitazone users. During follow-up, there were < 5 HF cases among 77 incident pioglitazone users and < 5 among 133 prevalent pioglitazone users without a history of HF. Median HbA1c at index date was 7.8% and 8.8% in incident pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, and 7.5% and 7.6% in prevalent pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, respectively. During follow-up of up to 4.4 years, 28.8% incident and 20.7% prevalent pioglitazone users discontinued pioglitazone.
Numbers of pioglitazone users in Denmark were low and decreased over time. Risks of BC or HF were low and risk estimates imprecise.
2011年8月11日在丹麦发送的一份直接医疗专业人员沟通文件(DHPC)提供了关于吡格列酮新标签以及监测治疗效果指南的信息。我们描述了DHPC发布后丹麦的吡格列酮使用情况,估计了心力衰竭(HF)的发病率,量化了膀胱癌(BC)诊断或未查明的肉眼血尿后吡格列酮停药情况,并描述了糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值。
这是一项队列研究。从丹麦基于人群的登记处创建了2011 - 2015年2型糖尿病新发病例或吡格列酮或胰岛素现患使用者的队列。估计了患者特征、治疗模式、实验室结果(适用于该人群的一个区域子集)以及HF和BC的发病率。
有80名吡格列酮新发病例使用者和17,699名胰岛素新发病例使用者,140名吡格列酮现患使用者和13,183名胰岛素现患使用者。吡格列酮新发病例使用者中无新的BC病例,吡格列酮现患使用者中新增BC病例少于5例。吡格列酮很少作为一线治疗药物。在不到5名新发病例和11名现患吡格列酮使用者中记录有血尿病史。在随访期间,77名吡格列酮新发病例使用者中HF病例少于5例,133名无HF病史的吡格列酮现患使用者中HF病例少于5例。新发病例吡格列酮和胰岛素队列中索引日期时HbA1c的中位数分别为7.8%和8.8%,现患吡格列酮和胰岛素队列中分别为7.5%和7.6%。在长达4.4年的随访期间,28.8%的新发病例和20.7%的现患吡格列酮使用者停用了吡格列酮。
丹麦吡格列酮使用者数量较少且随时间减少。BC或HF的风险较低且风险估计不精确。