Suppr超能文献

用于计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影和钙评分的标准化报告系统:在稳定性胸痛患者中 CAD-RADS 和 CAC-DRS 的真实世界验证。

Standardized reporting systems for computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: A real-world validation of CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS in patients with stable chest pain.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/imagingmedsci.

University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Jan-Feb;14(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic implications of standardized reporting systems for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) in patients with stable chest pain.

BACKGROUND

The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting And Data System (CAD-RADS) and Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) aim to improve communication of CACS and CCTA results, but its influence on prognostication is unknown.

METHODS

Images from 1769 patients who underwent CCTA as part of the Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) multi-center randomized controlled trial were assessed. CACS were classified as CAC-DRS 0 to 3 based on Agatston scores. CCTA were classified as CAD-RADS 0 to 5 based on the most clinically relevant finding per patient. The primary outcome was the five-year events of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 58 ± 10 years and 56% were male. CAC-DRS 0, 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 642 (36%), 510 (29%), 239 (14%) and 379 (21%) patients respectively. CAD-RADS 0, 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 5 occurred in 622 (35%), 327 (18%), 211 (12%), 165 (9%), 221 (12%), 42 (2%) and 181 (10%) patients respectively. Patients classified as CAC-DRS 3 were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared to CAC-DRS 0 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 9.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24, 27.31; p < 0.001). Patients with higher CAD-RADS categories were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, with patients classified as CAD-RADS 4B at the highest risk compared to CAD-RADS 0 patients (HR 19.14; 95% CI 4.28, 85.53; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher CAC-DRS and CAD-RADS scores were at increased risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This confirms that the classification provides additional prognostic discrimination for future coronary heart disease events.

摘要

目的

评估标准化报告系统对稳定型胸痛患者冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)和冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)的预后意义。

背景

冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS)和冠状动脉钙化-数据和报告系统(CAC-DRS)旨在改善 CACS 和 CCTA 结果的沟通,但其对预后的影响尚不清楚。

方法

对 1769 例接受苏格兰计算机断层扫描心脏检查(SCOT-HEART)多中心随机对照试验 CCTA 的患者进行了评估。根据 Agatston 评分,将 CACS 分为 CAC-DRS 0 至 3 级。根据每位患者最具临床相关性的发现,将 CCTA 分为 CAD-RADS 0 至 5 级。主要结局是五年内致命和非致命性心肌梗死的发生情况。

结果

患者平均年龄为 58±10 岁,56%为男性。CAC-DRS 0、1、2 和 3 分别发生于 642 例(36%)、510 例(29%)、239 例(14%)和 379 例(21%)患者中。CAD-RADS 0、1、2、3、4A、4B 和 5 分别发生于 622 例(35%)、327 例(18%)、211 例(12%)、165 例(9%)、221 例(12%)、42 例(2%)和 181 例(10%)患者中。与 CAC-DRS 0 患者相比,CAC-DRS 3 患者发生致命或非致命性心肌梗死的风险增加(风险比(HR)9.41;95%置信区间(CI)3.24 至 27.31;p<0.001)。较高 CAD-RADS 级别的患者发生致命或非致命性心肌梗死的风险增加,与 CAD-RADS 0 患者相比,CAD-RADS 4B 患者的风险最高(HR 19.14;95%CI 4.28 至 85.53;p<0.001)。

结论

CAC-DRS 和 CAD-RADS 评分较高的患者发生随后致命和非致命性心肌梗死的风险增加。这证实了该分类为未来的冠心病事件提供了额外的预后区分能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验