Department of Radiation Oncology.
Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Oct 1;105(2):367-375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) is a promising alternative for selected patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with oligometastasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of SAbR for longitudinal control in patients with persistently oligometastatic RCC. We report the impact of SAbR on tumor control rates as well as its tolerability in systemic therapy-naïve patients with oligometastatic disease (without brain metastases) and assess the effect of SAbR on subsequent first line systemic therapy by comparison to historical controls.
We reviewed patients with metastatic RCC treated with front-line SAbR with a curative intent from 2007 to 2017 at UT Southwestern Kidney Cancer Program. We analyzed local control rates (LCR), toxicity, freedom from systemic therapy (FST), type and duration of first-line systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used.
We identified 47 patients with oligometastatic RCC treated with SAbR to 88 metastases; 11 patients had more than 1 SAbR course. The local control rate was 91.5% at 2 years with no reported grade ≥3 toxicity. With a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range, 13.7-40.9), median FST from first SAbR was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-40.1). The most common systemic therapies initiated after SAbR were pazopanib (60.7%) and sunitinib (14.3%). The duration of first line systemic therapy appeared unaffected by SAbR. Improved FST was observed in patients with metachronous disease (hazard ratio, 2.67; P = .02), solitary metastasis (HR, 2.26; P = .05), and non-bone metastasis (HR, 2.21; P = .04). One-year and 2-year OS after SAbR were 93.1% (95% CI, 80.1-97.7) and 84.8% (95% CI, 69.1-92.9), respectively. Median OS was not reached.
SAbR is an effective and safe treatment for selected patients with oligometastatic RCC, can provide longitudinal disease control without systemic therapy for over a year, and does not appear to adversely affect the effectiveness of first-line systemic therapy once initiated. Prospective validation of these findings is being sought through a phase 2 trial.
立体定向消融放疗(SAbR)是一种有前途的选择,适用于选定的具有寡转移的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者。本研究的目的是评估 SAbR 在持续性寡转移性 RCC 患者中纵向控制的潜力。我们报告了 SAbR 在肿瘤控制率方面的潜力,以及在无脑部转移的寡转移疾病(无脑部转移)的系统治疗初治患者中的耐受性,并通过与历史对照比较评估了 SAbR 对随后的一线系统治疗的影响。
我们回顾了 2007 年至 2017 年期间在 UT 西南肾脏癌症计划中接受一线 SAbR 治疗的转移性 RCC 患者。我们分析了局部控制率(LCR)、毒性、无系统治疗(FST)、一线系统治疗的类型和持续时间以及总生存期(OS)。使用 Cox 回归和 Kaplan-Meier 分析。
我们确定了 47 例接受 SAbR 治疗的寡转移性 RCC 患者,共治疗 88 处转移灶;11 例患者接受了超过 1 次 SAbR 治疗。2 年时的局部控制率为 91.5%,无报道的 3 级及以上毒性。中位随访时间为 30 个月(四分位距,13.7-40.9),首次 SAbR 后的中位 FST 为 15.2 个月(95%置信区间,8.8-40.1)。SAbR 后最常见的一线系统治疗药物为帕唑帕尼(60.7%)和舒尼替尼(14.3%)。一线系统治疗的持续时间似乎不受 SAbR 的影响。我们观察到,在患有同步性疾病(危险比,2.67;P =.02)、单一转移灶(HR,2.26;P =.05)和非骨转移灶(HR,2.21;P =.04)的患者中,FST 得到改善。SAbR 后 1 年和 2 年的 OS 分别为 93.1%(95%CI,80.1-97.7)和 84.8%(95%CI,69.1-92.9),中位 OS 未达到。
SAbR 是一种治疗选定的寡转移性 RCC 患者的有效且安全的治疗方法,在无系统治疗的情况下可以提供超过一年的纵向疾病控制,并且一旦开始,似乎不会对一线系统治疗的有效性产生不利影响。正在通过一项 2 期试验来验证这些发现的前瞻性。