Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Gedimino Str. 50-311, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Gedimino Str. 50-311, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Environ Pollut. 2019 Nov;254(Pt A):112945. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.113. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Regulations that are indirectly driving the substitution of hazardous chemicals, such as the EU REACH regulation, necessitate improvements in chemical alternatives assessment frameworks. In those frameworks, life cycle thinking lacks some important aspects such as systematic and quantitative occupational safety methods and risks from intermediate chemicals that are not released to the environment under normal operating conditions. Concerns of companies about regulatory drivers regarding substances of very high concern often lead to inadequate evaluation of the baseline situation; an issue also overlooked by the frameworks. Moreover, life cycle assessment is optional for assessors with limited resources, such as small and medium enterprises. However, the success of substitution should not be evaluated without life cycle concerns. An environmental impact assessment model has been suggested to overcome these shortcomings of the chemical alternatives assessment frameworks. The model was applied to a case study of primed metal sheet production, where the company was driven to substitute reprotoxic 2-methoxypropanol used in their formulations. The results show that the proposed model is promising for solving the mentioned shortcomings, informing the assessor about substances of very high concern along the life cycle, and it has the potential to be further improved with the help of supporting software and databases. Particularly, in the occupational safety area that concerns risks of accidents at work, improvements to the EU occupational health database can drastically increase the accuracy of the assessments. Besides, the development of methodologies for the quantification of the impacts of reprotoxic, bioaccumulative and endocrine disruptor substances is necessary.
间接推动危险化学品替代的法规,如欧盟 REACH 法规,需要改进化学品替代评估框架。在这些框架中,生命周期思维缺乏一些重要方面,如系统和定量的职业安全方法,以及在正常操作条件下不释放到环境中的中间化学品的风险。公司对高关注物质的监管驱动因素的担忧往往导致对基线情况的评估不足;这也是框架所忽略的问题。此外,对于资源有限的评估人员(如中小企业)来说,生命周期评估是可选的。然而,如果不考虑生命周期问题,就不应该对替代的成功进行评估。已经提出了一种环境影响评估模型来克服化学品替代评估框架的这些缺点。该模型已应用于预涂金属板生产的案例研究中,该公司因制剂中使用的 Reprotoxic 2-甲氧基-1-丙醇而被迫进行替代。结果表明,所提出的模型有望解决上述缺点,在整个生命周期中为评估人员提供有关高关注物质的信息,并且借助支持软件和数据库,它有可能进一步改进。特别是在涉及工作场所事故风险的职业安全领域,对欧盟职业健康数据库的改进可以大大提高评估的准确性。此外,需要开发用于量化生殖毒性、生物累积性和内分泌干扰物物质影响的方法学。